Printable View
Now that I've conquered the simple player map, it just sits there, pointless. Why not let the resources regenerate over time? Then, instead of being a useless feature, I'm checking the map for what's ready to attack and earning some extra resources to pump into the economy.
SC probably wants to emphasize on attacking players rather than playing in a single player fashion
If that happens I'm sure players will choose to play in single player. Not disabling shields, easy, and great loots.
Hey, dude. Welcome to the forums. If you want a game more based on the amount of single-player oriented styles that this would implement into the game, I would recommend checking out Boom Beach. It is more like your idea than Clash. Thanks for posting but no thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by AMorse
As it has been mentioned, they are working on new maps. I do think they should add some more difficulty to make it more realistic, such as a clan castle where troops come out as you go up, each with more difficulty. Ex: First stage with cc: 5 barbs lvl 1, second stage with cc: 5 archs lvl 1.Quote:
Originally Posted by BaseAlpha11
I like this idea. Like you said the map just sours there useless. Maybe if one location became available a month let's say it would make it better. I kinda wish I had left the single player till th10. So much loot I didn't need at th6 and 7
Instead, why not add a few more levels in the Goblin Map ?Quote:
Originally Posted by AMorse
It'll just cause more requests of levels once people are done, especially since the request worked once beforeQuote:
Originally Posted by WarriorRudy
It's a good idea but it need tweaks. Like if you attack a base in single player that you already beat you should get 1/4 of the loot you got last time you beat it and only get the loot if you get 100%. Otherwise it could be a little op