Village Removal

I saw many new villages mostly were inactive, because the village mostly is the secondary of its owners. Especially at bronze league. I saw many mines and collectors that haven't been collected and make a huge pile, and I'm sure the village owner is inactive too. Example like me, I make a secondary account and it is level 9, and I'm choosing to focus on my primary village so for the secondary I rarely play it. Maybe Supercell can detect such those villages and remove them(if the owner wasn't visit his/her village for more than 2 months)? (I think to save up memory)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BaseAlpha11

I saw many new villages mostly were inactive, because the village mostly is the secondary of its owners. Especially at bronze league. I saw many mines and collectors that haven't been collected and make a huge pile, and I'm sure the village owner is inactive too. Example like me, I make a secondary account and it is level 9, and I'm choosing to focus on my primary village so for the secondary I rarely play it. Maybe Supercell can detect such those villages and remove them(if the owner wasn't visit his/her village for more than 2 months)? (I think to save up memory)

---

I find ghost base awesome to raid because they have lots of loot! And besides, what happens it the dude lost his phone and was looking for it or getting a new one in a few months. Not such a good idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BaseAlpha11

I saw many new villages mostly were inactive, because the village mostly is the secondary of its owners. Especially at bronze league. I saw many mines and collectors that haven't been collected and make a huge pile, and I'm sure the village owner is inactive too. Example like me, I make a secondary account and it is level 9, and I'm choosing to focus on my primary village so for the secondary I rarely play it. Maybe Supercell can detect such those villages and remove them(if the owner wasn't visit his/her village for more than 2 months)? (I think to save up memory)

---

I wouldnt want this implemented. Inactive villages are like finding a GOLD MINE to people because its easy and you tend to get huge loot just by barching the collectors. It will make it harder to raid if there are no more inactive villages.

I like raiding villages with level 11 collectors containing more than 300,000 elixir/gold!

sc does remove villages that are REALLY old, like half a year.


2 months would be too fast, and people will react rather unpleasantly to sc

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pikacu221

sc does remove villages that are REALLY old, like half a year.


2 months would be too fast, and people will react rather unpleasantly to sc

---

Half a year is a good idea.

Today does SC already do those removing villages? If yes I think this will not be an idea.

I saw many new villages mostly were inactive, because the village mostly is the secondary of its owners. Especially at bronze league. I saw many mines and collectors that haven't been collected and make a huge pile, and I'm sure the village owner is inactive too. Example like me, I make a secondary account and it is level 9, and I'm choosing to focus on my primary village so for the secondary I rarely play it. Maybe Supercell can detect such those villages and remove them(if the owner wasn't visit his/her village for more than 2 months)? (I think to save up memory)


I am a hard core farmer, I have farmed almost my whole clash career, taking out inactive bases would take away the farming element, I'm level 84 and my gold grab is 225 mil and elixir escapade is 200 mil I get almost all my loot from inactives, so I for one and many other users wouldnt apprecitate this

If a base has not been accessed by its owner for a period of 180 days or more, that base is subject to possible deletion. However, a lot of players are angry that this could lead to less easy collector raids, on which many farmers heavily rely on as a significant amount of their loot.

And kill the economy?