Skipping over the fact that this is in the wrong sub-forum (it should be here:
http://forum.supercell.net/forumdisp...op-Spell-Ideas ), I don't think these troops fit with each other. Greek soldiers and European semi-nobles don't have any connection, not even visually. So, why would one be summoning the other? And only the knight has any sort of argument to be on the same battlefield as the existing troops, but the "knight" spot has already been claimed by P.E.K.K.A.. So, this knight would make more sense as a hero form of P.E.K.K.A., but in the "READ BEFORE POSTING" sticky (found here:
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...rum-guidelines ), there is a section titled "
Currently Ruled Out". In this section, there is a sub-section titled "
Troop/Barracks Related", and in this sub-section, there is a bullet-point that says "
Requests for every troop types to have a related hero". Some people may interpret that to mean that 'posts requesting that every troop have a hero' should be banned, but I like to think that it bans posts requesting for heroes to go with any troop type for the sole reason that you think it would be cool, and since you failed to provide any explanation when putting forth your idea, it can only be assumed that the reason you think this idea should exist is because you think it's cool.
On a side note, when making posts in the future, people will take the idea more seriously if it is thoroughly explained (the more details, the better). If you can't be bothered to spend time creating your idea, why would you expect others to take the time to discuss it? A prime example, and perhaps the golden standard, of well thought-out and detailed ideas is Mastermind, here's one of his posts as an example:
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...f-pictures!%29