4 stars per base

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 2200361

I like that idea...

---

Not sure about the loot bonus part... But, I like the rest.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarkKnight02003

Short and sweet iam th10 lvl 111

50% is 1 star
90% is 1 star
100% is 1 star
th is 1 star

total 4 stars short and sweet and yes would help so clan wars are not so close or land on a tie. Also so if you get that annoying i ran out of time ♥♥♥♥ and get a 98% 2 star its not equal to a 50%( both with th kills). Which btw a 90%+ hit is very different than someone getting 52% 52 u got luck and close to 0 stars 90% your a couple upgrades from 3 starring.

---

Problem is in order to get 100% you still need the th so even with this system th is still worth 2 stars(technically).

The current system is fine. The system is supposed to be intentionally weighted toward destroying the TH.

If you get 96% and fail to destroy it, 1 star is what you deserve.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MigBelt08

Problem is in order to get 100% you still need the th so even with this system th is still worth 2 stars(technically).

---

I think he is saying 100% of base, excluding TH. That's how I read it, anyways.

Anyone else havr thoughts?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spurs978

It would be too easy to get one star.No one would win on defense

---

This. The amount of stars you get for a poorly planned raid (90% 1-star) isn't more important than someone working hard to get defenses. 25% 1-star = almost no defenses.

Make this happen!!!

I like the idea. I'm assuming that the idea is one star each for 50%, 75%, and 100%, and town hall. This would create better separation of results in war - a 99% 2 star is better than a 50% 2 star, and takes waay more effort to achieve. That effort and result should be rewarded. In general play, my view is that the loot bonus should increase with the number of stars - that is the current reward should be halved for 1 star, doubled for 4 star.

Anyone else?