Printable View
Clan leaders should be able to decide who goes to war or not!
By adding this feature this will prevent leaders from having to kick people from the clan who they feel is not ready for war.
This is the only way for now to assure we bring the best to war so others will not effect our war outcome due to lack of skills, base defense, and troops not up to par.
Please fix this issue SUPERCELL
THANKS
Wow this would be super nice. We added some. New friends we know this week and got creamed in clan war. It would be nice if we had more time with the newbies before they were in the war.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJSoAZ
Wow yes, that is also a great point. When new members join it would be nice to not have them in war right away. Many times I have seen new members join a clan, they are placed right in war based on their trophy count. But as soon as the war starts they leave the clan. "NOT COOL". By adding the feature of "WHO GOES TO WAR OR NOT, this will give leaders a little more control over this issue, by perhaps not choosing to bring new members to war until we feel comfortable with them in war.
I'm liking your idea!
This could be done simply by clicking the shield in the member listing. I would also make this possible for co-leaders.
Right now I kick and invite members I don't feel are up to the task. This feature would really help me and my clan.
Yes there definitely should be a way to pick who goes to war "before" you hit the start war button. There should be and opt out/vacation button. Its super lame to have to kick and reinvite good active player to your clan because you can't opt them out of a war for vacation, surgery, babies, work trips ( whatever life stuff) may be going on. Not only that but if your clan wars back to back like mine does there's not a way to send them a message or individual search them (without using an outside msg type of deal) to see whats up cause eventually they fall out of your war log list you can look at. You basically just got to "hope" they come back on their own.
I used to be a fan of this idea.
I've grown weary of wars where we get matched up against a much more powerful clan (i.e. we do 15 v 15, we have 5 TH9, 10 TH8; just got matched against 2 TH10, 5 TH9, 8 TH8). Luckily, the majority of these mismatches have idle players or players who leave the clan, and we end up winning because of it. If clans get the power to pick and choose who wars, then every opponent will use every attack - our number of losses is sure to increase. I'm tired of this game being a grind fest of nexting over and over for a little bit of lousy loot. I like easy war wins and the war win bonus.
The member should have the option not to join, not the leader. Leader can abuse this power. And of course if leader wants a member to "unjoin" for war for good reason n he won't listen, leader can kick.
While it'd be great to keep some members out of war, they'd be missing on war loot and the experience. Maybe limit the number of times a member can be skipped to 3, then once they're in a war, the number of times they can be skipped is reset. This will prevent abuse of power and give players moderated experience.
This sounds like a good ideaQuote:
Originally Posted by SavvyDubs
This option should be for leader and co-leaders only. As leaders we should decide this. If the member dis-agrees with the leader them the member can just quit or be kicked, in my opinion!Quote:
Originally Posted by schmooze