Printable View
What is the big problem with showing the amount of wars lost, why doesn't it reflect in the information? I mean, if people don't like their record, they could always start over. Me, I am happy with my clans record. That is something that may also help Hoppers from hopping. If the record is really reflected.
What if your clan loses a lot, then gets serious about war? It's hard to "start over" a clan.
This is not a good idea.
I would really love this to happen. right now my clan is 39 wins, 2 draws, and 0 loses... would be awesome to show that off. Want to be serious about warring with your clan but don't want to show off your loses? Make-a-new-clan.
Making a new clan isn't easy. Have you ever tried doing it?Quote:
Originally Posted by skyyyrdeath
Yes I was in a clan with 45+... me and the ones who wanted the hardcore warring left and made a new one and that is the one I speak of.
You don't lose anything by starting over but a fresh record. That's your problem that your clan loss a lot. I agree, please put up a loss record. Its so dumb and leaves no room for competency if there isn't a loss record.Quote:
Originally Posted by hesto25
Send a clan message saying new clan is formed and everyone to migrate over there. Wow that is so hard. If you lose members its because you're probably not a good leader and they didn't want to follow you, hence the "if we lose a lot and want to start over" would probably reflect your credibility.Quote:
Originally Posted by hesto25
If your clan lost a lot... It wasn't because of the entire clan... It was because you leader sucks ♥♥♥ and doesn't know how to get a clan organized and following a plan for the wars... Just saying. I want people to know what type of opponent they are facing in wars... Some of these clans, are inactive... Seeing a huge lost record would be nice, because it is nice to know I can save resources by not filling a clan if they don't care about wars... Just saying.
Strong war clans have basically nothing to benefit from showing war losses.
However, weak war clans (or clans that started off weak, but became stronger) have a lot more to lose if this feature were implemented. They would be stuck in a hole, unable to recruit good new members due to the stigma of their poor record from the past.
Again, strong clans gain little from such a feature; weak clans stand to lose a lot.
Stay modest, stay classy. We don't need to show losses. Let your attacks show your opponent who they're dealing with.
I disagree.... Any clan that actually takes wars serious this affects... Because recruiting for wars would be easier. There are so many clans who don't take wars serious that it is a annoying winning a war 104 to 0, and filling the clan castles before war, because the enemy doesn't have enough active players to actually war... That they hit start war, just because to see if they could get a easy loot for free.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawdog
If a clan does not take the wars serious.... Than why bother starting a war? Wars should be for players who want to play and enjoy the game. Warring is a part of the game that is getting abused by others because they hop, they don't have good leadership, and don't know what they are doing in wars or their bases. Showing a lost record, would make people take wars more serious. Just saying in the end it will make wars more fun and competitive.
I noticed a distinct lack of any counter of battles/wars lost, but I soon realized why that was the case. Knowing and listing the losses adds an unwanted psychological effect of wanting a perfect record, and in general, a fun spoiler. People will lose. That's the nature of the game. Not having a reminder of how much you suck (just kidding :p) helps with enjoyment of the game.
As soon as a number of lost battles comes into play, you will have people obsessing about it, and that is rarely ever enjoyable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabriel0322
So your complaint is moreso that your clan is winning TOO easily and you want to actually be challenged more. That's a different story.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabriel0322
In that case, you would want to suggest clan war classes. For example, 5 classes. Clans are divided as follows:
Class E) 0-20% war win percentage
Class D 21-40% war win percentage
Class C) 41-60% war win percentage
Class B) 61-80% war win percentage
Class A) 81-100% war win percentage
That way, on top of the regular clan war matchmaking criteria, this extra "class" distinction would ensure you're up against a clan of equal stature.
But this won't happen. Matchmaking against such specific metrics will mean super long wait times to be matched up against a formidable opponent.
Winning wars too easily is hardly something to complain about, I'd say. I do understand you actually want to feel challenged in war, it's part of the fun/competition. But at least you're always getting great resource bonuses each war, unlike the clans that are losing almost all their wars.
I would tend to agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenJames
People want a perfect record... That's why most hoppers hop after joining and looking at clan war log... If they see a lost they automatically jump. Doesn't necessarily mean the clan lost because they suck... Could have been a close war, and hoppers ruined the potential win. Seeing a clans win/lost record... Doesn't necessarily mean you have to be perfect... As no clan is perfect... Everyone eventually has to deal with how troops actual go in the war... Because they don't always do what people want... Seeing a record of 2 wins and 100 loses, yea that's not a good sign so go to a clan that may have better potential. Seeing a clan 34 and 10... That is a clan with potential. Just saying it should be easily accommodated. To show a loss record. As i bet people will be more willing to take suggestions on bases from people to strengthen them... Then just being ♥♥♥♥y and thinking they are too good to be in a clan.