PvP attack match ups

I would suggest that match ups for PvP attacks use a similar mechanism to how players are ranked in wars. For example, create x number of player levels, say you end up with 1000. Let players ranked 1-100 search only for players in that level, 101-200 same, etc.

Seems like the match up mechanism for PvP attacks now is flawed as it can be manipulated too easily by trophies.

bg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bgdadx4

I would suggest that match ups for PvP attacks use a similar mechanism to how players are ranked in wars. For example, create x number of player levels, say you end up with 1000. Let players ranked 1-100 search only for players in that level, 101-200 same, etc.

Seems like the match up mechanism for PvP attacks now is flawed as it can be manipulated too easily by trophies.

bg

---

The strength of the matchupin wars is based on defensive levels, meaning your matchups are now skewed by Th level and max defense levels. Alternatively, if a Th10 that is rushed has low defense but maxed Troops are they relegated to attack lower ths until they up their defenses?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HiFliya

The strength of the matchupin wars is based on defensive levels, meaning your matchups are now skewed by Th level and max defense levels. Alternatively, if a Th10 that is rushed has low defense but maxed Troops are they relegated to attack lower ths until they up their defenses?

---

I would think that would still be an improvement over the current match up mechanism, so IMO, yes, in your example, I would relegate that player to a lower 'group' of players. Maybe the match up mechanism should also take into account offensive levels, but would weight the D and TH levels higher than the O.