Yeah , I so agree with you. Golems suck giants are better.
Printable View
Yeah , I so agree with you. Golems suck giants are better.
1 golem takes the place of 5 giants.
5 giants are 5 time more powerful = 5 times more damage to defenses.
5 giants less = you can not destroy defenses
Do not tell you destroy with barbarians as barbarians have zero chance against my base.
May be they are effective against your weak base ?
Why are people not capable to give argument and tell one is a troll when one do not agree with the conformists who do not think but repeat ?
If you were intelligent, you would stress that my giants are level 6 and golem level 1. But you seem to dumb to do it.
Yes, damagewise giants are better, but that is not their purpose, golems have vastly more HP than giants and when they die they split and form mini golems.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lesmog
In the OP you stated that the golem was as good as 1 giant, and now you compare it to 6 giants? Hb is better by a million.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lesmog
Dead rapidly? 4500 hp + 2x900 hp is nothing to sniff at, and that's only one level 1. They are better damage absorbers than giants due to them only taking damage once from area defences.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lesmog
6 level 6 giants (30 camp spaces) have collectively 4800 hitpoints... But they would take 330 damage collectively from one lvl7 mortar shot vs the 55 against the level 1 golem.
In terms of damage golems do suck, but that isn't how to use them. Relatively speaking to other troops giants have a low damage output. Don't forget the splash damage when golem/little golems die, adds up to 550 damage at level 1.
To respond to this, I would say that 1 golem weighs more then 6 giants, and is definitely living with a higher density. That said, 6 giants probably have more intelligence, but would eat more. That means it takes more food for them to eat, like wafers and beetles and whatnot. As golems only eat rock, they are quite cheap to feed. And their droppings are easy to sell to people who want shingle-based driveways.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lesmog
My arguments therefore favour the golem over the giants. Everyone must agree, surely.
ok, now i get it. You are using it to try and kill stuff. That is NOT what its for. U place it then go in with barbs/archers, or wizzies/pekkas.
Your arguments do not annoy people soley because they disagree with you, but because they are neither consistent nor coherent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lesmog
So, now, if we are talking about what is better at taking out defences, then yes, six (not five) level six giants will outperform one level one golem. But, offence dps is not the primary function of giants or golems. Their primary purpose is to absorb damage while troops with a much higher dps attack the base. Golems not only have more hit points when they do this, but they also are not affected by splash damage like a group of giants are.
To say whether giants or golems are better because of their ability to take out a mortar, is like trying to determine if a balloon or a wall breaker is better based upon its ability to get gold from a gold storage. Sure, they can, but that's not their primary function.
I hate barbarians
Wow... people are so ♥♥♥♥♥♥ed, stop feeding the troll ffs