Printable View
That's not what he said at all, and there have been several updates (small and large) since the statement was made. You make it sound like the idea was new to them, and they just needed some more time to figure out how the button (or whatever) would work. It's by no means a foregone conclusion that there will ever be anything resembling the simple "in/out" button many of you are pleading for; quite the opposite, in fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobad
Who cares what Steve said anyhow, we are the consumers, both paying and non-paying. Our demands have to be met, so if you want or don't want the opting system - make sure you are heard!
So what about the low level players thst want to fight but aren't given the opportunity? Most clans are reluctant to risk losing members by kicking them against their will, but merely opting them out?Quote:
Originally Posted by rwelshjr
You could accomplish this now by simply creating a sister clan where once a week all your top players migrate to and start a war without your lower tiered players. Both groups could have a war at the same time matched against similar ranked opponents. Since the war record is not important you wouldn't even need to keep the war clan active by leaving a mini in it, just create a new one each time. Then the rest of the week you can war with the main clan and continue to help your lower level player progress. No one has to sit out a war so the others can play against evenly matched opponents and your lower level players still benefit from your guidance durring the combined wars. While this is more effort than an opt out system, it doesn't require a rework of CWs and it avoids the possible downsides associated with opting out.Quote:
Originally Posted by rwelshjr
Interestingly enough, I was with a clan a few months ago where our " top " player based of TH and troop lvls was actually our worse attacker in wars. It was the classic double edged sward, we got a tougher match up based on his relative strength and we were forced to war without a player skillful enough or strong enough to take on the opponents top two players. In that case we would have wanted to opt out that player. We all appreciated his ability to donate good troops and he was a great clan member he just couldn't grasp the basic strategy of attacking.
you gonna eat that?
http://i.imgur.com/lNGIdzl.jpg
What a ridiculous comment.Quote:
Originally Posted by SlightPurple
As long as Supercell is making millions per day (or whatever they're raking in), I don't think they need to worry very much about "demands" for change.
Re-read my post and you will see where I spoke to how we work with them as well as some things we would like to be able to do to help them grow.Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBGood
Glad you are back. that other guy was tough.
There are reasons why they are making millions per day, obviously.Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBGood
Solution: (This is what my clan does)
We offer the ability for a player to "drop out" of a war, by posting it in a specific area. Come war time, our leader and Co's kick those who drop out, then start war. After a matchup if found, all booted members are reinvited and we resume normal activity. This ensures that all who want to war will, and those who don't have the ability tutu to continue farming of pushing.
Does this mean you're ready to admit there could be negative consequences associated with the implementation of an "opt-out" button in clan wars? If not, you should ask your friend to elaborate, as I don't seem to be able to get through to you in the same way.Quote:
Originally Posted by rwelshjr
I'm not sure what "cat guy" said that you haven't already heard, but good to know that you see there are reasonable people who disagree with you.
Yes, and it's not because they change the game every time a few people on this forum demand it.Quote:
Originally Posted by SlightPurple