Can a feature be added for the clan leader to bench certain members that aren't active? Similar to fantasy football. Its much easier than booting and rejoin for every war.
Printable View
Can a feature be added for the clan leader to bench certain members that aren't active? Similar to fantasy football. Its much easier than booting and rejoin for every war.
If they aren't active just kick em . Leaders should never have this power. Let the members decide whether or not they want to war.Quote:
Originally Posted by sg333
How it should work...
There should be a button (it can be a new one or the war shield can be
modified) that toggles a player as in or out.
Access to hit the button to toggle should go to the leader and the player in
question.
---- individual players cannot opt each other in or out
---- its an argument either way to give it to co as well - Good for clans where
co is a management job, bad for clans that give it out like candy. (I consider
the latter to be a sign of a bad leader)
---- A leader who abuses authority to opt guys in against their wishes are
really just hurting their own selves for how they are adding a risk to their
war participation. (the guy might then just not attack anyhow, if not seeing
eye to eye with leader he wont care)
---- A leader opting a guy out against his wishes has that prerogative to
decide who he wants in his war. And its still nicer than just kicking the guy
like happens now.
The status of a player is only a factor right at the time a war starts.
Instead of just selecting all eligible players from the total population it
will just be all eligible players from the opted in group.
---- Can even implement by leveraging the existing eligibility functionality
that currently is only driven by a timer.
After that everything works the same. The list of warriors from the clan is
rounded to an even 5 via the existing logic and then the matchmaking
calculation takes place also using the existing logic.
A player joins a clan with his eligibility set the same way it is today. (He is
in unless there is a timer)
Things that would not happen -
...A player cannot add themselves to a war after the fact. If they change their
status during a war it makes no difference until the next war when that status
is read at startup.
...This would not serve as a way to replace members that take off during war.
if they do that then there is the same affect on the war as there is today.
Unused attacks stay unused. (it will never change that this just stinks when
guys pull that stunt)
Welcome to the forum !!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by sg333
The items at the top of each sub forum marked as stickies are a great place to start your forum adventures. !!!!
As an example......
Please read read this stickied thread to give you some ideas that have been suggested, it also lists some that have been ruled out as well as general ideas about posting.
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...rum-guidelines
There are several helpful threads in the new to clash and forums area as well.
http://forum.supercell.net/forumdisp...4-New-to-Clash
once again, welcome !!!!!!
That one is not ruled out son. And no need to welcome me to the forum, I have been here a very long time. Maybe you should let the moderators handle playing cop.Quote:
Originally Posted by THNSUM
Lol don't think that was meant for you. Also, i think he/she was directing them to the Freq requested portion of the stickyQuote:
Originally Posted by rwelshjr
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwelshjr
I didnt quote you son...... Maybe you should learn to read........
And war op out has been suggested a million times.... Reposting ideas that have already been posted is discouraged so they don't clog the boards...
Also, Steve has said that its under consideration to be worked on in the next big CW update, but its not in the cards atm.Quote:
Originally Posted by THNSUM
Yeah, I just see these guys that have taken it on themselves to prowl the forum looking for guys to pounce on. They have appointed themselves the sticky cops.Quote:
Originally Posted by HiFliya
Sometimes they are even right too, and it keeps them from seeing why their policing is counter productive.
A lot of times the OPs are describing an idea they havethat is from a different point of view and wording so they don't see that it is the same as something already ruled out. other times they offer a variation so that there idea is arguably a little different from the ruled out one. In all those cases its more constructive to explain the reason for the rule out than to just wag fingers at them. Finger wagging is seldom constructive..
I personally think they will add it at some point.... But as you said.... I was just pointing the new member to the general guidelines about posting ideas... As for the other guy......sigh....... There is one in every crowd....amazing how tough or rude folks are from behind their keyboards.... Normally I just add them to my ignore list..... This time...well.... I'm not his son.... I'm probsbly older than he is....lolQuote:
Originally Posted by HiFliya