Dont know wat to say and how it will help the game, ideas r how to make game better or new things, this is neither, sorry
Dont know wat to say and how it will help the game, ideas r how to make game better or new things, this is neither, sorry
Thats the idea....impossible no, but a harder, yes.....attacking atm is way on the attackers side...this may even the playing field a bit....harder attacks need to come.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiler
They have already tried helping out the defender by stopping heroes being lured and skeletons. Extra mortar.
this will help even more so ppl can actually get a def win on occasions.
Im maxed th10 in champ and def wins dont happen very often unless a huge gemmer is still learning, very rare.
this i think my give me/others a helping hand and change how we play for the better ;)
li understand some ppl will be against it, thats normal. But me personally, i wish they never changed it. Would love to have it back.
also like i said, im maxed and in champion, 99% achievements done...what else can i do but grow trees and try to better my def in even more ways :)
So what, you agree the new live feed on watching someone attack you if by chance you log on while being attacked....which happens once a month...any more then that and your watching someone snipe you th...is improving the game? Great time and money spent on that feature lol we have "replays"Quote:
Originally Posted by Mann23
Sticking your TH in the corner where it can't be touched and then essentially forcing attackers to destroy twice as many buildings to reach your TH is significantly more difficult, if not impossible. I realize you want to play with your trees, and you're free to do that, but I really don't think you've considered the consequences that would come of this. This game should favor the attacker, otherwise we should all sit behind our shields with invincible bases, letting our collectors fill upQuote:
Originally Posted by Naz
I understand....but if your not getting th cos its in the corner....how you living off a shield lol and im sure your collectors will be useless as farmers will just take them as they will be near outside obviously...and you can still easy get 50% if you must...its not impossible.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiler
may i add....only 1% of long term players that even want to spend the time doing trees for yrs will be able to do it....not everyone will just cover two sides of their base with trees in a week.
no
it would make gems impossible and bases cluttered
What if this were a thing only until players reached level ... I dunno ... 40?
Personally, I like the idea. Trees can't be moved, so it would mean that people could factor the landscape into their design, or clear-fell them for gems as people do now. It would give players a choice about what they wanted to do, and would provide a interesting element for new players.
It feels awkward to me, to rip down every tree in sight. My town will look like a barren wasteland, which is what most villages I come across look like now.
As for parts of the village being untouchable. The AI could be factored in that if two trees are next to each other, a third tree can't spawn within X spaces.
This is a great idea, I think the same should apply to decorations as well, because its just weird to see troops landing on flower beds.
But the problem is that those would just be an overpowered version of this, so it probably won't happen anyways.
No, no, no.... Randomly spawning obstacles shouldn't give a player an edge on defense.
Didnt know they could lay down troops on top of trees. I been letting mine grow for months - lol. oh well time to go get some xp & free gems then.