Im glad to see you at least get the point of the comment.
As for all your stuff on buying based on production costs, you took one aspect of my argument and not the whole. Production costs are part of what makes costing, but so does the market itself. A movie in part may have high production costs because actors are paid such huge salaries. This is a result of the industry and fame itself. What you say about conditioning is true, but that conditioning keeps things stable and reigns in inflation. This is why when something is priced way outside the market is in, people cry foul over it (not necessarily because they can't afford it).
You obviously have the right to spend your money where you want. But I reserve the right to call you stupid for it, as well as calling supercell greedy. If angry birds can be such a profit maker by charging $2 per customer, then supercell (a self proclaimed small company-although this is questionable) would be raking in the cash. This is their right to do so in a capitalist society, but it doesn't mean that charging $40 for pixelated men to throw ropes round your pixelated buildings and hammer away monotonously to indicate a building process is happening is not a rort. It most certainly is, and you are stupid for supporting it.

