My proposal to the hero solution missing in wars when upgraded

So I'm sure most of you are well aware of one of the biggest issues this game faces. Those long hero upgrades that unfortunately rendure them unusable during war. Anything level 10 and up is just a drag to endure the long upgrade time, and cripples your clan during wars.
My solution is to implement a third hero. Of course, this would alter the balance, which is why only two can be in service at any time. Have to upgrade a barb king? No problem. Use your queen and <insert new hero>.
Supercell is looking to make money off of gemming. While this may hurt them slightly, I'm certain many players will still gem their heroes due to a need to have their strongest heroes ready for a big war. So what are your thoughts?

Wouldn't it simply make more sense for them to allow upgrading heroes to function in wars? It certainly would be far less complicated.

Yes judy, it would! Supercell will not even acknowledge this as an issue though because they're caught up in their own greed.

Adding another hero at this time will require a lot of balancing, plus right now Supercell is doing an awesome job, getting much wanted and long time requested features into the game. So it will be easier to allow them to used in war, when upgrading, but i dont assume it will happen. About Supercell making money, thats why games r built and they provide good content and updates, its also about making money, wouldn't u like to get paid to for working ��

I would even propose the third hero costing $5, just to offset costs to counter this problem. I'd certainly buy it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mann23

Adding another hero at this time will require a lot of balancing, plus right now Supercell is doing an awesome job, getting much wanted and long time requested features into the game. So it will be easier to allow them to used in war, when upgrading, but i dont assume it will happen. About Supercell making money, thats why games r built and they provide good content and updates, its also about making money, wouldn't u like to get paid to for working ��

---

Supercell is the top grossing game on the market. It's time to give back a little, and this is the biggest inconvenience this game currently has. Like I said, even a charge of $5 for the 3rdhero would be fair.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pyrodox

Yes judy, it would! Supercell will not even acknowledge this as an issue though because they're caught up in their own greed.

---

So they make a game that you can play completely for free. Then they continue to update it periodically with many of those updates the result of player feedback, and you call them greedy?

Seriously?

Take a step back a look at who is actually being greedy here. Just because your priorities and SC's priorities are not the same does not make them a villain and you some sort of victim. Quit acting like one.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dahimi

So they make a game that you can play completely for free. Then they continue to update it periodically with many of those updates the result of player feedback, and you call them greedy?

Seriously?

Take a step back a look at who is actually being greedy here. Just because your priorities and SC's priorities are not the same does not make them a villain and you some sort of victim. Quit acting like one.

---

Like I said, they're the top grossing game on the market. I personally have invested $25 into the game. Try taking a look at the price of gemming a hero. It costs minimum 500 for me at level 12 heroes to fast upgrade. Tell me genius, do you think this is a fair price EVERY TIME I need to get my hero into battle for a war? Really, you're going to justify paying $5-10 on gems every time? And it's only going to get more outrageous as I push from 20...to 30...to 40. Get off your high horse defending greed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pyrodox

Like I said, they're the top grossing game on the market.

---

How is this relevant? They actually have to have a pretty good (aka fun) game in order to achieve this distinction no?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pyrodox

I personally have invested $25 into the game.

---

So?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pyrodox

Try taking a look at the price of gemming a hero.

---

Oh I'm well aware. Most likely far more so than you will ever be. Take a guess at who figured out the algorithm SC uses for pricing gem expenditures. Yep those handy dandy gem calculators on the wiki...you're welcome.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pyrodox

It costs minimum 500 for me at level 12 heroes to fast upgrade. Tell me genius, do you think this is a fair price EVERY TIME I need to get my hero into battle for a war?

Really, you're going to justify paying $5-10 on gems every time? And it's only going to get more outrageous as I push from 20...to 30...to 40. Get off your high horse defending greed.

---

You did read my first comment in the thread right? I actually was agreeing with you. Then you decided to go into full blown rager mode. Another person just posted a thread asking for perhaps a 20 gem payment to be able to use upgrading heroes in a war.

Guess what, I agreed with them too.

Adding another hero has been ruled out. However, I do agree with dahimi:D