Clan member unit control in wars

The purpose is to reduce clan war inequality when clan members do not attack in war.

Allow clan members in the last 4 or so hours left in the war to create units for members who did not yet attack.
1) the units are created in the non-attacking members base, so there is no unfair advantage of higher level players creating high level units.
2) the cost of making the units is with the member creating the units to attack. This eliminates people complaining someone else made a dragon army and wasted all there loot.
3) the player who paid for the units gets the war loot. Self explanatory.

I know some will argue to just kick members that don't participate. I don't like that idea since you need to chose between friends/casuals who make the game fun with needing members who play more seriously. I rest my case.

So someone create troobs in my war base and he get my war loot bonus? NO thank you

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mhed

So someone create troobs in my war base and he get my war loot bonus? NO thank you

---

What do you mean?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by protitans

What do you mean?

---

The proposal is that in the last 4 hours of the clan war, unused attacks can be made by anyone within the clan and the loot bonus will go to the person who made the attack. It's limited by the troops and camp space of the person with unused attacks.

I can see this causing huge problems within a clan however...

'Dude you used my attack, I was at work and was gonna attacks as soon as I got home and now I can't. You ninja'd my loot bonus you *&#$%!!!'

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jietoh

The proposal is that in the last 4 hours of the clan war, unused attacks can be made by anyone within the clan and the loot bonus will go to the person who made the attack. It's limited by the troops and camp space of the person with unused attacks.

I can see this causing huge problems within a clan however...

'Dude you used my attack, I was at work and was gonna attacks as soon as I got home and now I can't. You ninja'd my loot bonus you *&#$%!!!'

---

This, People attack within the last 2 hours sometimes.
Also this could easily get took advantage of.
Someone sees so and so can attack a base for a high loot bonus and knows these people will attack in war in the last minute, but they don't care and attack anyway taking away so and sos loot bonus.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FrostKing

I know some will argue to just kick members that don't participate. I don't like that idea since you need to chose between friends/casuals who make the game fun with needing members who play more seriously.

---

Your idea is absurd. Sorry, but I'll be the one to say it. If you want to choose friends/casuals over war then maybe you shouldn't war at all and just enjoy playing with friends. Otherwise, get use to not being able to trust your 'friends' to attack in war.

There is absolutely no reason any other player should be able to use the attacks of another player, under ANY circumstances. Low leveled players that blow at attacking would no longer use their attacks, allowing top-level players to perform far more competant war attacks with their troops. That's complete nonsense. Someone either uses their own attacks or they don't; as a clan leader it's up to you to do something about no-shows to war - not to steal their attacks and use them yourself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jietoh

The proposal is that in the last 4 hours of the clan war, unused attacks can be made by anyone within the clan and the loot bonus will go to the person who made the attack. It's limited by the troops and camp space of the person with unused attacks.

I can see this causing huge problems within a clan however...

'Dude you used my attack, I was at work and was gonna attacks as soon as I got home and now I can't. You ninja'd my loot bonus you *&#$%!!!'

---

Not mention abuse by design.

Low members don't use their attacks, so the higher members use it for them?

With this feature, we'd max out every single war!