Will Super Cell ever fix wall breakers?

The wall breaker AI is insanely bad. I have given up on the idea of Super Cell caring about this issue and major flaw in the game. It is hard/impossible to use strategy that is dependent on breaking a wall to get into a compartment when the wall breakers *might* hit the section you hope for. But the fact is, wall breakers will run further left or right than they will straight. I do not understand how or why or what the point is of placing a WB in one area only to have it go to a completely different area. If it were wanted in that area, it should have to be placed there.

I do just fine with mine You just have to learn how to use them properly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Snarg

I do just fine with mine You just have to learn how to use them properly.

---

I can deploy them in literally the same spot and have them go in different directions. Or blow up walls when there is a gap already there. Whats worse is when you spam several at a time and they just go for the nearest wall regardless of whether there is a building near it or not

Yea, sometimes they do go haywire. But their AI isn't as bad as some bloopers with dragons, PEKKA, AQ, & BK that I've seen. Just don't spam more than you need in one spot - that's just begging for unreliability.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by budawpi

Yea, sometimes they do go haywire. But their AI isn't as bad as some bloopers with dragons, PEKKA, AQ, & BK that I've seen. Just don't spam more than you need in one spot - that's just begging for unreliability.

---

I have never seen drags, king or pekka not act according to ai. Even if you drop two to blow up one wall in the same spot they still go haywire. I dont know how long you have been playing but before and even now it is standard practice to drop a lot together and rage. This is because once they get to the wall, it blows up and the next closest is the wall to the core. If you drop them later then they go for another walls to the side somewhere

Lol first thread complaining about WB... they are perfectly fine.

Their AI from what i know; they dont actually target walls, they target buildings. If you have a AD behind an enclosed wall the wb will tArget it for troops to get into. If there are other other buildings enclosed next to the AD like [][][][] <<<< like this all other wbs will target the next enclosed building. After all those buildings have been opened the will target the next layer of buildings that are enclosed. Hope this is clear. /:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bouges

The wall breaker AI is insanely bad. I have given up on the idea of Super Cell caring about this issue and major flaw in the game. It is hard/impossible to use strategy that is dependent on breaking a wall to get into a compartment when the wall breakers *might* hit the section you hope for. But the fact is, wall breakers will run further left or right than they will straight. I do not understand how or why or what the point is of placing a WB in one area only to have it go to a completely different area. If it were wanted in that area, it should have to be placed there.

---

They already did fix them lol. If you think they are bad now try like 1.5 years ago. They would hit walls spikes. The wbs ai is fine. Stop whining bub.

I think it is connected to a troop's detection range

SC should post something about it (it's also the reason why an AQ attacks walls)

I have a problem w/ wb's breaking walls, which don't form solid boxes. :( And that happens a lot when they have to break a box far away.

If SC were to prioritize AI then I would suggest that they fix wizards. They are worst. They literally go around a canon and start hitting a building, which they already passed on their way to the canon. They drunk or something? It really sucks to have such an expensive unit (time and gold wise) be so unreliable.