Does anyone Want Gems buying availabilty lowered ?

I mean Clash is suppose to be competitive and gems is basically unlocking a door to easy winning if you/parents are rich. I mean just to max out your base is more then 12 000 dollars. Then using more to finish hours of troop training it makes being in the top hard. I mean I am still TH7 and I have fun playing since I have competition. But to be at the top most people pay carts of money. I am not saying take away gem buying. But do you guys agree that the amount you can buy should be lowered to add competition ? and also maybe nerf wall prices. Because at TH5 - TH8 you have tons of competition and you can play at a normal pace. But being up at the top paying 4 mil for one wall is insane. So yea who agrees ?

this is a freemium game. Sooooo. no.
Everyone that bought/farmed the walls are suppose to get what in return?
And, imagine you had a pipe that gives you unlimited money. would you turn it off? No.

Gems are the ony wy for SC to earn money, so if you nerf gem buying, SC will earn less money, so they'll be loosing the interest in this game! - That's how economy works!

But seriosly: Don't be insane! SC put inactives in the searching queue back, so we don't get that much loot and have to by resources woth gems, they are doing everything they can to buff gem buying and you exspect them to nerf it???

I disagree. In this game, a person either spends money or time or both. By buying gems a person is simply buying time.
1.People either spend their time in real life, earn money and spend it on the game or
2. Spend large amounts time in game and achieve the same things as a gemmer.
There are people who have actually farmed lv11 and lv40 heroes so it's doable.
As for the leaderboard, yes you'll probably have spend time and money to get on it.But that can be said for any freemium game's leaderboard.You can't just start playing a game and expect to get on there.

plez let's not bring up wall prices AGAIN

Not a good idea...

No, people should be allowed to play the game however they like...

And wall prices were already nerfed...

you'd like to be top?

in a game, hard work can get you there
but when everyone is already working hard, there needs to be another parameter to separate players, and thats gems (money)

if you want to be at the top of a game where no money is "needed", go play skill games (like rhythm/fighting games)

this is a freemium game

If some people (who want to play for free) don't want other people to be able to buy an advantage, then they shouldn't play freemium games.

I'm an adult with adult responsibilities so I don't have time to play 6, 8, or more hours a day. If I'm lucky I can squeeze in a two hour session in a day. (And that's basically if I'm chilling on the couch watching TV. And even then, I can't play it uninterrupted.) Should I put up a poll asking SC to nerf the amount of time players can play in a day so they don't have an advantage over me? :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Khuzy

I mean Clash is suppose to be competitive and gems is basically unlocking a door to easy winning if you/parents are rich. I mean just to max out your base is more then 12 000 dollars. Then using more to finish hours of troop training it makes being in the top hard. I mean I am still TH7 and I have fun playing since I have competition. But to be at the top most people pay carts of money. I am not saying take away gem buying. But do you guys agree that the amount you can buy should be lowered to add competition ? and also maybe nerf wall prices. Because at TH5 - TH8 you have tons of competition and you can play at a normal pace. But being up at the top paying 4 mil for one wall is insane. So yea who agrees ?

---

Just a question you like clash right?

If yes them then answer is no.

If people didn't buy gems, there would be no game anymore.

okay I guess pple like gems then ( to be honest i may have spent around 50 dollars on gems )

As south park said this is a freemium game

They won't lower it unless there's a promo that won't happen

You can gem everything but in the end it's your skills that wins the battle

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Khuzy

okay I guess pple like gems then ( to be honest i may have spent around 50 dollars on gems )

---

I've never purchased a gem (and haven't even used any free gems except to buy builders) but I still voted no in the poll. People that buy gems pay for the game so I can play for free. In exchange they progress faster than I do with less effort on their part. It is a good trade off. We are both happy.

I am yet to buy gems, mainly because of the price.
It's what, 1400 gems for 4 mill gold? That equates to about 13 dollars. To max out a single archer towers it's gonna cost me 7.5 mill gold, almost 2800 gems or 26 dollars, which is too much for a virtual item.