Just remove loot penalty for collectors

This seems like a fairly obvious fix, for me: why not just remove the loot penalty for collectors? The loot penalty was intended to protect lower levels from being bullied by higher levels, but if a town hall 7 isn't bothering to move his collector loot into storages, there's no reason to protect that loot. Hell, SuperCell has said a couple of times they want to reward higher town halls, loot-wise, not punish them; give a loot BONUS for collectors for higher town halls. Instead of getting 50% from a town hall level below you, one could get 60%... and 70% for two town hall levels below, and so on. But seeing how, as a TH9, it takes no less skill for me to raid a town hall 7's collectors than another TH7 doing the same, I see no way in which the current loot penalty on collectors aligns with SuperCell's stated desires for high town halls' access to loot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by azlaier

Hell, SuperCell has said a couple of times they want to reward higher town halls, loot-wise, not punish them; give a loot BONUS for collectors for higher town halls.

---

A bit off topic, but I don't recall they ever mentioned this. Perhaps what you mean is the reverse ?

About loot, lower town hall level has less option both to defend him/herself and to raid higher level town halls, even for a collector raid. Thus the penalty is somewhat well justified.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by azlaier

This seems like a fairly obvious fix, for me: why not just remove the loot penalty for collectors? The loot penalty was intended to protect lower levels from being bullied by higher levels, but if a town hall 7 isn't bothering to move his collector loot into storages, there's no reason to protect that loot. Hell, SuperCell has said a couple of times they want to reward higher town halls, loot-wise, not punish them; give a loot BONUS for collectors for higher town halls. Instead of getting 50% from a town hall level below you, one could get 60%... and 70% for two town hall levels below, and so on. But seeing how, as a TH9, it takes no less skill for me to raid a town hall 7's collectors than another TH7 doing the same, I see no way in which the current loot penalty on collectors aligns with SuperCell's stated desires for high town halls' access to loot.

---

Queue millions of TH10s in silver league hunting for inactive TH7s.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BoardGuest808888

A bit off topic, but I don't recall they ever mentioned this. Perhaps what you mean is the reverse ?

About loot, lower town hall level has less option both to defend him/herself and to raid higher level town halls, even for a collector raid. Thus the penalty is somewhat well justified.

---

Anoushka said the following in the new loot thread: "We don't want to penalize players as they progress further in the game, quite the opposite, these players should be rewarded and one of our main goals for the future is to make it a smoother transition from TH8 to higher levels. "

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sj74

Queue millions of TH10s in silver league hunting for inactive TH7s.

---

Not an issue, considering the loot penalty for storages would still exist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by azlaier

Not an issue, considering the loot penalty for storages would still exist.

---

You wouldn't need storages if you could get the full amount for collectors in silver league.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sj74

You wouldn't need storages if you could get the full amount for collectors in silver league.

---

If those collectors are already full where is the benefit in letting them full instead of someone who needs them collect them? It is already being wasted, why not enter the economy? I support this idea either removing the penalty or decreasing it to a certain level

No, we should be encouraged to raid bases properly not play about on the outside looking for collectors. This only really helps players that play way more than average. I really can't see SC helping those guys out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Saleh47

If those collectors are already full where is the benefit in letting them full instead of someone who needs them collect them? It is already being wasted, why not enter the economy? I support this idea either removing the penalty or decreasing it to a certain level

---

If those collectors are full, they will be raided regardless of the penalty. The constraint is finding bases with full collectors.

This is actually a very interesting idea.

The one issue I can see if that if 10's and 9's can get the same amount of resources from collectors it'll take away those collector raids from lower TH's.