Give Clan Leader & CO's. Power to manage defences & players for Wars.

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

November 22nd, 2014
haste01

Give Clan Leader & CO's. Power to manage war troops & ppl, to opt in or out of wars.

Power should be given to Leaders & CO's to do the following things. To make the game more fun on the war front.

1. Allow leaders co. To manage defences according to how they see fit. Owner of set clan castle still can do what they want for their troops. That being said those people being the leadership know whats best for the clan & should know what defence will work best for a particular clan members base. This will stop unwanted troops from being donated & can be removed by the leader/co's rather than waiting for the owner of that base to do it..... who knows when. This will also stop people that are purposely trying to annoy other members by giving bad troops that have no significant use for a war.

2. Allow the leadership to dictate who goes to war & hand pick the people who want to war. You can give members a tab/vote who want to war. Or let leadership pick who goes... besides they should know who participated 100% of the time in the past.

A. This will fix many things.... on so many levels. It will allow people that want a break from wars... take their own break and not feel obligated to play wars for fear of letting their members down & in some cases kicked.
B. Everyone gets busy at times & can't play certain days of the week to have something lingering in the back of their head that they must attack for a war they didn't want.
C. Then you have your semi active and not active members who can ruin a war because they decided to no play for some days and they end up screwing the entire clan, unwillingly of course and in some cases on purpose, this will stop people from trolling members & entire clans all together. While giving the option for members who are loyal to the clan to take breaks from wars from time to time.
Enclosing.
I wanted to keep this short... but I'm sure there are some things I didn't mention. But these are the ones important to me as leader of a clan and this is a problem. We go sometimes to war unprepared and missing some members for wars.. but for the sake of keeping the majority of members happy... we war. But a war can go really bad if even 2 members are not going to attack because of "x" reasons. And everyone who participated just lost a very large amount of resources. Especially the ones that use dragons with rage spells.

I am sure every organized clan has this problem from time to time. And would love this option. So that they are not forced to kick players who have been active and loyal for months straight at a time. And are forced to kick them for not being war active and are playing on a semi active level. Notes:: The player / owner of their clan castle will have full power of what they want. But to give the option to the leadership to tweak clan castle to certain troops being donated would save a lot of time.
Example: Bob wanted to give Joe. A lvl 4 dragon, and someone gave them 5 archers.... Bob can remove those 5 archers and drop that lvl 4 dragon. Since that lvl 4 dragon would be of much better use.

Thank you for your time on this matter.
Let's get this done.

----adding more input ----

2. I strongly believe that people should be allowed to have an icon option.. to be in a clan they want to be in for other reasons that are not to war... To OPT out and choose to stay out of wars and yet remain with their friends and at times family. With the assurance they will not hurt their clan members, friends & or family in wars. Do to either lack of time, interest, busy schedule & other reasons not allowing them to participate the way they would want to.
A.) This will not force a leaders hand or CO. To kick a person for inactivity during war time. When set player/member has been active for such a long time and have become semi active for personal reasons
November 22nd, 2014
JahRed

Quote:

Originally Posted by haste01

Power should be given to Leaders & CO's to do the following things. To make the game more fun on the war front.

1. Allow leaders co. To manage defences according to how they see fit. Those people being the leaders know whats best for the clan & should know what defence will work best for a particular clan members base. This will stop unwanted troops from being donated & can be removed by the leader/co's rather than waiting for the owner of that base to do it..... who knows when. This will also stop people that are purposely trying to annoy other members by giving bad troops that have no significant use for a war.

2. Allow the leadership to dictate who goes to war & hand pick the people who want to war. You can give members a tab/vote who want to war. Or let leadership pick who goes... besides they should know who participated 100% of the time in the past.

A. This will fix many things.... on so many levels. It will allow people that want a break from wars... take their own break and not feel obligated to play wars for fear of letting their members down & in some cases kicked.
B. Everyone gets busy at times & can't play certain days of the week to have something lingering in the back of their head that they must attack for a war they didn't want.
C. Then you have your semi active and not active members who can ruin a war because they decided to no play for some days and they end up screwing the entire clan, unwillingly of course and in some cases on purpose, this will stop people from trolling members & entire clans all together. While giving the option for members who are loyal to the clan take breaks from wars from time to time.

I like this as it adds a starcraft or command & conquer feel to it. At a minimum Leaders and Co's should be able to kick out anyone's Castle troops.
November 22nd, 2014
jobro

Quote:

Originally Posted by JahRed

I like this as it adds a starcraft or command & conquer feel to it. At a minimum Leaders and Co's should be able to kick out anyone's Castle troops.

Thats too much power to the co leaders and leadrs. I dont want some person who shouldnt be co putting my defenses away from everything and kicking out all of the good defensive troops and putting in goblins and wall breakers. No, i will not let you control my base.
November 22nd, 2014
haste01

Quote:

Originally Posted by jobro

Thats too much power to the co leaders and leadrs. I dont want some person who shouldnt be co putting my defenses away from everything and kicking out all of the good defensive troops and putting in goblins and wall breakers. No, i will not let you control my base.

That's the idea....
A clan should only appoint co leaders who are devoted to the clans success in war. Other wise don't make... for example: 10 co leaders one of them can be a troll. And want to screw with people. ..

And that's already a problem for some clans & has happened in the past in mine . You have players purposely drop goblins or wall breakers and then at times barbarians. Then someone like myself a clan leader. Has to take the time and go in clan chat to tell that particular player that's getting trolled to take out the unwanted troops from the castle. The player / owner of their clan castle will have full power of what they want. But to give the option to the leadership to tweak clan castle to certain troops being donated would save a lot of time.
Example: Bob wanted to give Joe. A lvl 4 dragon, and someone gave them 5 archers.... Bob can remove those 5 archers and drop that lvl 4 dragon. Since that lvl 4 dragon would be of much better use.
November 22nd, 2014
JahRed

Quote:

Originally Posted by haste01

Power should be given to Leaders & CO's to do the following things. To make the game more fun on the war front.

1. Allow leaders co. To manage defences according to how they see fit. Owner of set clan castle still can do what they want for their troops. That being said those people being the leadership know whats best for the clan & should know what defence will work best for a particular clan members base. This will stop unwanted troops from being donated & can be removed by the leader/co's rather than waiting for the owner of that base to do it..... who knows when. This will also stop people that are purposely trying to annoy other members by giving bad troops that have no significant use for a war.

2. Allow the leadership to dictate who goes to war & hand pick the people who want to war. You can give members a tab/vote who want to war. Or let leadership pick who goes... besides they should know who participated 100% of the time in the past.

A. This will fix many things.... on so many levels. It will allow people that want a break from wars... take their own break and not feel obligated to play wars for fear of letting their members down & in some cases kicked.
B. Everyone gets busy at times & can't play certain days of the week to have something lingering in the back of their head that they must attack for a war they didn't want.
C. Then you have your semi active and not active members who can ruin a war because they decided to no play for some days and they end up screwing the entire clan, unwillingly of course and in some cases on purpose, this will stop people from trolling members & entire clans all together. While giving the option for members who are loyal to the clan to take breaks from wars from time to time.
Enclosing.
I wanted to keep this short... but I'm sure there are some things I didn't mention. But these are the ones important to me as leader of a clan and this is a problem. We go sometimes to war unprepared and missing some members for wars.. but for the sake of keeping the majority of members happy... we war. But a war can go really bad if even 2 members are not going to attack because of "x" reasons. And everyone who participated just lost a very large amount of resources. Especially the ones that use dragons with rage spells.

I am sure every organized clan has this problem from time to time. And would love this option. So that they are not forced to kick players who have been active and loyal for months straight at a time. And are forced to kick them for not being war active and are playing on a semi active levelThe player / owner of their clan castle will have full power of what they want. But to give the option to the leadership to tweak clan castle to certain troops being donated would save a lot of time.
Example: Bob wanted to give Joe. A lvl 4 dragon, and someone gave them 5 archers.... Bob can remove those 5 archers and drop that lvl 4 dragon. Since that lvl 4 dragon would be of much better use.

Thank you for your time on this matter.
Let's get it done.

Quote:

Originally Posted by haste01

That's the idea....
A clan should only appoint co leaders who are devoted to the clans success in war. Other wise don't make... for example: 10 co leaders one of them can be a troll. And want to screw with people. ..

And that's already a problem for some clans & has happened in the past in mine . You have players purposely drop goblins or wall breakers and then at times barbarians. Then someone like myself a clan leader. Has to take the time and go in clan chat to tell that particular player that's getting trolled to take out the unwanted troops from the castle. The player / owner of their clan castle will have full power of what they want. But to give the option to the leadership to tweak clan castle to certain troops being donated would save a lot of time.
Example: Bob wanted to give Joe. A lvl 4 dragon, and someone gave them 5 archers.... Bob can remove those 5 archers and drop that lvl 4 dragon. Since that lvl 4 dragon would be of much better use.

What he said. I am a leader. My Co is my fiancé, we love this game! And all my elders even have been with the clan for months, most more than 6 and a few over a year. None of my leadership would troll and give goblins. If you're a clan that allows those guys to be leaders you are in the wrong clan. The leader plan is to make sure troll members don't jump in and donate goblins to inactive people and then you the leader just have to sit there and hope they log on. I do not like that Supercell refuses to put in checks in place so that a clan can be for war AND just playing the game. Some people just want to do their battles or go on vacation and such.

Finally of you are an active player you can still kick back out and change your base back. This is mostly for inactive people and for new people. A clan leader could "actually" show a new person how they would set up their base if you allow leaders and Co's to do so.
November 22nd, 2014
HiFliya

Personally? I hate the idea of my leaders picking what my base looks like. It's a players game. Not the leaders. However I do agree that bad troops should be managed by the leader
November 22nd, 2014
Harrypt63

There are th5 cos in good clans. I dont want them putting my infernos outside to guard a dark drill!

Lemme guess, you're a leader?
November 22nd, 2014
Harrypt63

Quote:

Originally Posted by JahRed

What he said. I am a leader. My Co is my fiancé, we love this game! And all my elders even have been with the clan for months, most more than 6 and a few over a year. None of my leadership would troll and give goblins. If you're a clan that allows those guys to be leaders you are in the wrong clan. The leader plan is to make sure troll members don't jump in and donate goblins to inactive people and then you the leader just have to sit there and hope they log on. I do not like that Supercell refuses to put in checks in place so that a clan can be for war AND just playing the game. Some people just want to do their battles or go on vacation and such.

Finally of you are an active player you can still kick back out and change your base back. This is mostly for inactive people and for new people. A clan leader could "actually" show a new person how they would set up their base if you allow leaders and Co's to do so.

Congratulations on the marriage!!!
November 22nd, 2014
haste01

Quote:

Originally Posted by HiFliya

Personally? I hate the idea of my leaders picking what my base looks like. It's a players game. Not the leaders. However I do agree that bad troops should be managed by the leader

How do you feel about.... if players decided to not war and opt Out from war ? Or leadership picking who goes to war based off of members feedback? Example. Little Bob, says he can't war and little Maggie says the same. So they opt out from war and have a box select option to not war for personal reasons. Thus ensuring loyal members are not affecting war outcomes because of time constraints and wish to remain in the clan. There should also be an alternative to letting leadership position players to select players who want to war versus those who are torn about even wanting to war yet wish to remain in the clan for other purposes such as: friendly players, good donating players etc.
November 22nd, 2014
haste01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harrypt63

There are th5 cos in good clans. I dont want them putting my infernos outside to guard a dark drill!

Lemme guess, you're a leader?

I think the guy said... if they wish to do so...
not saying that they had to give them that power... even I don't agree to such a thing. Let's use common sense guys and be rational on a very mature level. There is to much content here to go over. But something has to be done about the war monger players vs. Those that could care less or are semi active but are very promising players, donate a ton & active.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page