Lower the nexting price

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pololo

The bad part in nexting is not the cost, it's just a parameter you have to think about when you decide to upgrade someting or to press next instead of attacking.

The bad part is the time spent doing nothing but pressing a button.

Cheaper nexting would mean nexting even more waitting form an easy opponent

---

I agree with him. Problem for me is having to watch bases with empty resources which are not worth anyone's time. Hell Im prepared to pay double the nexting cost if bases which are raid-worthy comes up more often. It doesn't have to be collecter raids just bases offering decent loots.

if the cost for nexting would be 0 gold then we would never find a good loot base again because they would all have been taken by the ♥♥♥♥ing people as they would not run out of gold which is the only way from stopping their search

A small reduction at th9/10 would be helpful, but I don't think we need significant changes.

certainly not 0. That would be silly for really obvious reasons.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thunderstorm225

I have an even better suggestion. Abolish the search costs altogether.

They are not serving any purpose. They act as a barrier to attacks. We already have a barrier to attack in the form of troop training time. We don't need another.

Abolishing search costs will make the game more efficient.

---

That would be something.

Sometimes I attack for the sake of trying to cover my costs in gold searching. And revenge attacks are shield up!

Freeeee please, nexting hurts.

- dinner

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pololo

The bad part is the time spent doing nothing but pressing NEXT button

---

fixed a bit.

so agree.
i dont care if they charge me 50k if in 1 next i found juicy storage/collector raid already.
this is clash of clan, this ia about raiding, not spending time pressing NEXT 60K NEXT 40K NEXT 90K....NEXT 100x..ahhh there it is 200K!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spatz

if the cost for nexting would be 0 gold then we would never find a good loot base again because they would all have been taken by the ♥♥♥♥ing people as they would not run out of gold which is the only way from stopping their search

---

That is not true.

Abolishing the search costs will make the loot less erratic and more even and uniform. If they are not making it zero, then at least reduce it by 50%.

I have even better suggestions for matchmaking. Give users the option for what kind of bases they want to attack. There will be filters and only the targets that satisfy those filters will be shown.

For example, a person should be able to select an option such that he will be shown targets with town hall 8 or more and with gold loot available more than 250,000.

Another filter could be show only targets with dark elixir more than 1,500.

This will reduce the time in 'Next'ing drastically. Everyone wins because the game becomes more efficient.

I don't see any reason to not implement this feature. Unless Supercell wants to make game difficult for the players so that they can buy gems to make it easier. But I don't think it will affect their sales. They should do a 'beta testing' in some country to find out.

Remove "Next" since they removed good loot.

If you are spending over 50K nexting, then you need to stop being picky. i have ALWAYS found a base with more than 150 k in one resource in less than 50k.

I am a max th 8 (besides walls, which i am doing now) looting between 1150 - 1350 trophies.

The nexting cost should def not be taken away or reduced. I think it is good.

And we should not be able to filter bases. If that happens, then there will be no more good loot within a days because everyone will just filter only high loot bases and they will dry up.

just my 2 cents

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by travisjohnson99994

If you are spending over 50K nexting, then you need to stop being picky. i have ALWAYS found a base with more than 150 k in one resource in less than 50k.

I am a max th 8 (besides walls, which i am doing now) looting between 1150 - 1350 trophies.

The nexting cost should def not be taken away or reduced. I think it is good.

And we should not be able to filter bases. If that happens, then there will be no more good loot within a days because everyone will just filter only high loot bases and they will dry up.

just my 2 cents

---

Ah ... to be a TH8 again. When you get to TH10 and you're paying 1,000 gold per next and half of the bases you're presented with are 50K or less and the other half are less than 100K, you'll change your opinion. ;)

I don't press next because it's fun, I press next because I need a decent ROI on troop training time/cost to make an attack worthwhile.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordHalestorm

Ah ... to be a TH8 again. When you get to TH10 and you're paying 1,000 gold per next and half of the bases you're presented with are 50K or less and the other half are less than 100K, you'll change your opinion. ;)

I don't press next because it's fun, I press next because I need a decent ROI on troop training time/cost to make an attack worthwhile.

---

This is the underlying problem, not the price of nexting. These bases need more loot and if they do, remarkably nexting cost (and time) will go down