Another Hero is good idea, but I think you only may use up to two heroes when attacking otherwise it becomes imbalance
Printable View
Another Hero is good idea, but I think you only may use up to two heroes when attacking otherwise it becomes imbalance
It is hard enough to raid a base with two heroes on guard. Another would suck even more de out of the system and cause a power imbalance from the ones that could afford to gem it.
(Edit to say clan war raid)
It has been said by supercell no new hero.
And the biggest reason is i have not upgraded goblins since lvl4 and im th10
I personally think that there would be no cons in adding a goblin vs barb king toggle switch to the kings throne at th8, same way as there would be a toggle switch on archer queens throne between a wizard or a witch hero!!
Seriously it would be very good to even more balance out different kind of focus in the raid and to balance out different kind of strategies by letting the player decide what he want to focus on both with hero's and troops!
As long as goblin king would be balanced with the barb king for either ones purpose there would be no harm to let each player decide if they want to have a barb king or gobs king to lead their barbs or gobs into battle or a witch queen or archer queen to lead the archer or witches into battle?! Its all about balance and limits, I don't understand why people take it the way that the only way to add hero's is to let people have them all in battles at same time, please think further before you destroy suggestions at least!
Also this shouldn't be at general as someone mentioned but as long as it comes with balance I don't get why supercell wouldn't do this way.
That is just it. He could never be balanced. His hp would have to be so low and dps so low that he would be nothing more than a golem with lower hp. Sind him in early everyghing shoots him. Sind him in at the end after 30 giants have taken all the def and now ir is op.Quote:
Originally Posted by HamsterGubben