Hi!
The game is great. Here is one idea:
Let co-leaders have opportunity to challenge leader and if win in 3 of 5
clashes with them, then become a leader.
There are many leaders in clans that are not active or become bad.
Bye.
Hi!
The game is great. Here is one idea:
Let co-leaders have opportunity to challenge leader and if win in 3 of 5
clashes with them, then become a leader.
There are many leaders in clans that are not active or become bad.
Bye.
I literally was thinking about this samething. A lot of leaders become inactive or really are using they clans as a way to get themselves troops all the time(by that bad ratio) or simply be ruining a good clan with a bad attitude. Some break every rule that they set. I would like to see this option.
No, lets say a maxed th10 joined a clan with a fresh th4 leader that has a full clan when the th10 joins. So the th10 joins and challenges th th4 and gets leadership then kicks evreyone then leaves, disbanding the clan.
This can be tooken advantage of, way to easily so no.
If your leaders bad join a new clan.
i'd rather they put in a rule that if the leader has been inactive for 10 days, then the leadership passes to a co leader. or it passes to whomever donated the most troops in that 10 day span. something like that.
The leader of the clan owns the clan, period. If you don't like the current leader, make your own clan.
im all for that see to many clans with inactive leaders with nothing but chaos & drama going onQuote:
Originally Posted by Thwnd
Right, the leader owns the clan, if you dont like it, but dont want to leave, because of the friendships, take some of the clan with you. I had to do this, and about 25% of the clan came with me, including all the people i wanted
Much this.....I'll never understand why, but many clans seem to use rank as an incentive to join. Those clans will easily be destroyed with something like this. Also, leader shouldn't be decided on strength. Who gets leader should be decided by how they lead and how they act, not how strong they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zannan
Well said dahimi, well said. OP there's nothing keeping you from leaving. And if you know people in the clan, you're a co (I'd assume, since you want cos to challenge the leader), so if you and many others are dissatisfied with the leader there's nothing stopping you from sending a mail about the creation of a new clan, or even through messenger/kik/skype/etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by dahimi
10 days might be a little soon, but passing off leadership if a leader has gone inactive is a great idea. No sense in throwing away a clan because a leader suddenly stopped playing or lost his account.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thwnd
This is a thread about an idea to change that. I think everyone knows how it works currently.Quote:
Originally Posted by dahimi
This proves nothing. Being a leader or co is based on LEADERSHIP. Not who has the better base.Quote:
Originally Posted by burthusac
ITS THE LEADER'S CLAN.... YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO OVERTAKE HIM... THAT'S KIND OF LIKE DICTATORSHIP.... LEADER REMAINS THE LEADER (NO OVERTAKING!) period!
If the leader of your clan is inactive then leave. Having co-leaders and leaders challenge for top position would cause a lot of problems in clan.
I don't really see the point. If the leader wants to promote someone, he will. If the leader thinks he needs to be challenged by a co-leader to find out if he's good to lead, he probably hasn't been in the clan for very long and therefore shouldn't be the leader. :)
It's the leader's clan not the co's
too true all of these responses are too true it has nothing to do with the base lol and everything to do with leadership
Changing that is a terrible idea. It rather obvious how much griefing would occur if you could challenge the leader to combat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Warble
Having some sort of login time limit also sucks. You already have all the tools you need at your disposal to deal with a leader you don't like. After all they can't force you to stay.
Stealing a clan from the current owner should never be something that is allowed.
But this is exactly why we have co-leaders in the first place.
The leader would just disband the clan or kick the challenger if he sees someone winning