Why there is no such a thing cost 80 000 DARK ELIXER
Printable View
Why there is no such a thing cost 80 000 DARK ELIXER
I just think that having a third hero would make the game a tad unbalanced. Not only that, but the Barbarian King is the Beast version of a Tier 1 troop. Then how powerful do you expect a P.E.K.K.A. King would be? (also, a fun fact is that no one can tell the gender of PEKKA, so it would make sense to call it "P.E.K.K.A. Lord") Ultimately, I think that a new hero of that Tier would be immensely overpowered, and even if they were to make it a version of Barbarian King, we already have a melee Hero... Why do we need another?
That would be ridiculous... PEKKAs do so much damage that if a PEKKA hero was made and was much more powerful... there'd be room for a new crazy defensive building to say the least. :p
But really, that's an awful idea. Sorry.
That reminds me that a Lv1 Pekka is more powerful than a Lv1 Barbarian king to start with.Quote:
Originally Posted by TreeBranchTwig
P.e.k.k.a is not strong enough in the game or fast or even fit and fat I think that if we added a one fast and not this fat or small it will be good and one big and strong sword in his right hand unlike the king it will be great
Or maybe new lv 6 p.e.k.k.a
NuclearBot sounds better :)
what? You think the pekka isnt strong enough? Please tell me that you are just some TH7 or lower who is confusing a PEKKA with something else. A level1 pekka is stronger than a level5 barbarian king.Quote:
Originally Posted by MostafaHakim606
I think another hero would ruin the game because attacking/defending with two heroes is op enough already.Quote:
Originally Posted by MostafaHakim606
Well, adding a third hero isn't going to neutralize that OP'edness.Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMarc