We demand to have our levels back

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dahimi

Create strawman arguments and knock them down? Yes you do.

---

Looks like someone still wanted to win the argument. I made my point. Give it one more try.

Okay, so the badge thing does work. We started a push on the 28th and most of my clan mates are concentrating on achieving a certain badge color. With that said, it would be nice for chat to contain both the badges and the player level.

The new loot bonus has not deterred my clan mates from wanting to farm so we will go back to allowing farming on the 6^th.

In the end, The Farmers will farm and the Gemmers will gem so might as well just add the levels to the badge and be done with it.

Re the comments about moderations, the mods keep an eye on all threads so we have a nice community where people can feel comfortable to express their opinions. This one has come close to action being taken a few times as it was getting personal, but there have also been some really well thought out comments as well, and people seem interested in the subject so as long as there are no personal attacks we are all good.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GobFather

Looks like someone still wanted to win the argument. I made my point. Give it one more try.

---

No you wanted to win the argument by posing a series of easy to answer questions that had little to do with countering my ideas.

Do I like peanut butter? Yes I do.

Is water wet? Yes it is.

I made my point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dahimi

No you wanted to win the argument by posing a series of easy to answer questions that had little to do with countering my ideas.

Do I like peanut butter? Yes I do.

Is water wet? Yes it is.

I made my point.

---

Don't just say it, respond to it. I pointed out flaws and I stuck with the topic. The only thing that had little to do with the topic so far has been peanut butter and water.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Huddy

Okay, so the badge thing does work. We started a push on the 28th and most of my clan mates are concentrating on achieving a certain badge color. With that said, it would be nice for chat to contain both the badges and the player level.

The new loot bonus has not deterred my clan mates from wanting to farm so we will go back to allowing farming on the 6^th.

In the end, The Farmers will farm and the Gemmers will gem so might as well just add the levels to the badge and be done with it.

---

What does farming and gemming have to do with levels? Supercell wants players to value trophies and not level. There is no add levels to the badge and be done with it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GobFather

Don't just say it, respond to it. I pointed out flaws and I stuck with the topic. The only thing that had little to do with the topic so far has been peanut butter and water.

---

There is nothing to respond to. I have already explained to you twice the logical fallacy you have used. Perhaps you will understand wikipedias definition.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dahimi

There is nothing to respond to. I have already explained to you twice the logical fallacy you have used. Perhaps you will understand wikipedias definition.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

---

You explained nothing. Just accused me. Point out where I am wrong. Break it down. Accusing someone is easy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GobFather

You explained nothing. Just accused me. Point out where I am wrong. Break it down. Accusing someone is easy.

---

I explained 3 times and even gave you an external source. You are either being deliberately obtuse or you are simply incapable of understanding. Either way I'm not explaining it again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dahimi

I explained 3 times and even gave you an external source. You are either being deliberately obtuse or you are simply incapable of understanding. Either way I'm not explaining it again.

---

You accused me three time, that's not explaining... this isn't whatever dahimi says or accuse is true, right? I'm not asking for the explanation of the definition, if you haven't noticed.... it's for the explanation of each of the points I made to you... starting with why I thought you agree with 808... which led to your accusation. I won't ask again, you can ignore it if you can't do it.