Printable View
Wouln't it be nicer if your war loot depends on the number of stars you gained on wars. For example you gained 1 star, you would only gain 50% of the war loot in that particular base, 2 stars; 75% of the warloot, and 3 stars 100% of the warloot available for that base. I think this would promote competitiveness and rule out those members whose only aim is do 'lootings' on wars, which, is really annoying. Thank you for reading.
I wouldn't mind if they add this...however it would take out the fun of town hall sniping that base for loot when everyone knows your clan won lol
well, yes, it would deeply sadden those Th snipers. But shouldn't be lootings done in raids? in wars, you have to work hard for your stars (and your loots). Besides there's that 20% war loot bonus already, i think that really is a big help even if you got only 1 star. HAHA
I wouldn't be in favor of this idea. I often raid towards the end of war and pick up some stars on the higher bases because the lower ones have all been 2-3 starred. It would also cause some people to not attack better bases in the fear of losing the majority of their war loot
I see your point but there's just a thing when you and your Clan mates know we won when its 35-3 and there's the th snipe with the war bonus of 200k and everyone just starts sniping. You do have to earn the snipe though since you have to three star until you feel comfortable to snipe.
Yeah, thats along the lines of what I was thinking. The majority of people put a lot of effort, time, and elixer into their attacks. I just think it would be unfair to "punish" them because they were unable to pick up more stars. In your example of killing in war, the clan earned the lead(as you said)...so I believe the th snipe should not be a bad thing in that case