Printable View
We do wars everyday. Sooo to make ours in good state. We do kicking before search and invite them back after search. So to make clan war more handy? PLEASE ALLOW US TO CLICK NAMES ON CLAN LIST IF THIS PERSON IS INCLUDED OR NOT.
Example, i clicked Marika's name because she cant do war... We dont need to kick her because i already clicked her name on the list of not included on the war list...
Sorry for bad english so please SUPERCELL READ THIS...
This is so freaking true! I couldn't agree more, personally this is a very important thing to me.
Bump :rolleyes:
.....if I had a dollar for everytime this was made a new thread....
:rolleyes:
Then you would be a rich man, yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by tincanman
But that does not change the fact. That SC havent made this possible yet :rolleyes:
Agree!
This is a leader feature!
I agree, the possibility for players who want to go to war, really handy. Maybe minimum of 10 people and then you can set the clan of 5 people, but to get your players to war could choose themselves.
Its useless think, u can already kick useless players count of players is not everythink
Your thought is not a proper thinking of a "Good Leader" instead, i suggest this idea because you need to preserve your member and do wars without kicking em just to initiate war... So yeaQuote:
Originally Posted by Not4You
:rolleyes:
I can't go active everyday,and most of us can't,so the best time for warring is weekends.Quote:
Originally Posted by Not4You
How it should work...Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeNQ
There should be a button (it can be a new one or the war shield can be modified) that toggles a player as in or out.
Access to hit the button to toggle should go to the leader and the player in question.
---- individual players cannot opt each other in or out
---- its an argument either way to give it to co as well - Good for clans where co is a management job, bad for clans that give it out like candy. (I consider the latter to be a sign of a bad leader)
---- A leader who abuses authority to opt guys in against their wishes are really just hurting their own selves for how they are adding a risk to their war participation. (the guy might then just not attack anyhow, if not seeing eye to eye with leader he wont care)
---- A leader opting a guy out against his wishes has that prerogative to decide who he wants in his war. And its still nicer than just kicking the guy like happens now.
The status of a player is only a factor right at the time a war starts. Instead of just selecting all eligible players from the total population it will just be all eligible players from the opted in group.
---- Can even implement by leveraging the existing eligibility functionality that currently is only driven by a timer.
After that everything works the same. The list of warriors from the clan is rounded to an even 5 via the existing logic and then the matchmaking calculation takes place also using the existing logic.
A player joins a clan with his eligibility set the same way it is today. (He is in unless there is a timer)
Things that would not happen -
...A player cannot add themselves to a war after the fact. If they change their status during a war it makes no difference until the next war when that status is read at startup.
...This would not serve as a way to replace members that take off during war. if they do that then there is the same affect on the war as there is today. Unused attacks stay unused. (it will never change that this just stinks when guys pull that stunt)
Bumping your own thread is against the Forum Rules.
I don't think he did that. OP has not posted in months. It was someone else. The guy that brought it back from then is someone new never on it before. (and I am too) (And you are too)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ideaman
I am agreeing again and again.... So I'm just going to copy paste.
From my thread (http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...pt-In-Out-Poll)
Reasons
The main reason is, as stated above, because people don't want to kick people and invite them just so they can opt outon war. While that is a solution, it has some consequences, including misunderstandings, drama (omg, you kicked me out so that I wouldn't be in war) and loss of donation statistics.
Some might argue that if one does not wish to participate in war, one must simply join a clan that does not participate in war. The reason this is not true for many people is that those who care about being able to opt out are more likely to be loyal members, or at least friends with many. Leaving as a group is not a solution either since the group of friends would still be split between warring and not warring. Splitting the group results in the splitting of friends, which lowers the amount of motivations to keep playing CoC. If sister/feeder clans been implemented, that would be a long workwaround that could still be flawed.
There is another reason that this is suggested, which is that players will still "have a life" outside of CoC. This includes vacations, examinations, business trips, blackouts (+and other force majuere disasters) in the residence of one player which doesn't affect the others physically etc.. Thus, some players would only opt out some times and return to war actively.
From http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...-option-button
"Originally Posted by SuperSteve[Supercell] In thread:http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...-option-button
Hey Guys,
We've talked A LOT about adding an opt-out feature in Clan Wars and it's not currently in the cards. At this point, we just haven't found the right solution that fits Clash how it should.
We always try to avoid unnecessary complexity in our feature design and strive for features that work consistently and simply for all players. Some players would be thrilled with an opt-out system, but others would prefer things like opt-in, leader-chooses, variable team sizes, or other solutions. Also, letting players pick-and-choose what components of their clan experience they participate in is not a design philosophy we support. When you're in a clan, you should all be in it together! Even further, implementing a system that can enable undue pressure on players ("Opt out or we'll kick you" or "Give me Crab Claws or you can't come to war with us") falls far short of this mark.
That being said, we're in favor of adding more control and meaningful direction to Clan Wars. When we look into the next batch of Clan Wars features, that will be the time to reconsider things like opt-out systems, and possibly come up with better solutions that encourage everyone in their Clan to stick together and participate no matter what. We'll see what happens!
We'll keep tabs on any feedback and ideas you guys come up with for future Clan Wars improvements. Keep the feedback coming.
Cheers,
Steve
----------------
from the same thread as above
From my experience in CoC (not just me, but also my clanmates), I'm going to added to the list [of stuff that people have given to say why the don't want it but need it] at the end of the post.
"They spoke of fractured clans, lost members", lost friends, stress that may have led to GPA loss (hence less chance for college and all that nonsense), lots of drama, rebellions within clans, inter-clan drama/rivalry and family problems of all sorts including, but not limited to, parent/child and siblings.
now that's what I call a bump 'n' a halfQuote:
Originally Posted by EmeraldRange
I would love this.