only for war as it is the a good reason for it to be used if it counts both the offense and defense of it
/signed
only for war as it is the a good reason for it to be used if it counts both the offense and defense of it
/signed
Concordo em usar na guerra de clans o Rei e Rainha para atacar mesmo eles atualizando.
/Signed
Losing wars just because several clanmembers are upgrading their heroes is ♥♥.
People stop being delusional this idea will kill SC's income. Once again this needs to be locked up.
Signed...
badmamajama
If they wouldn't have this topic, a lot of these replies would turn into topics suggesting this feature. I think they better have a single topic with many replies than multiple topics with no replies. With or without chances of being implemented, until it would be added as ruled out, people are entitled to talk about it.Quote:
Originally Posted by BluBest
Thank God a Supercell employee is here to reign in this madness. When did you join SC, and what do you do for them? Can you share some financial data to support your claim that heroes in war would bankrupt them? Also, care to explain why a fellow employee of Supercell stated the reason this hasn't happened yet is due to "technical" issues, and said nothing to about it "killing [Supercell's] income"? You guys might want to get your story straight. And hey, when do you get your shiny Supercell logo badge on your profile?Quote:
Originally Posted by BluBest
Great idea
/signed
Would really help
/signed
I've heard you say this tons of times. I don't agree or not agree to this, I guess I'm kinda neutral.Quote:
Originally Posted by BluBest