mini cc

so I have had this idea for 2 not 1 but 2 mini cc's that have to be placed strategically around your base. you have to be th level 9 to get both. it'd be called a rally point or something

Notes: You do not request for clan mates to fill up the rally points, you fill them up yourselves.
There is NO loot storage from clan wars (unless supercell increases profit from the wars)
These are for defense only, you may not bring them to battle with you...
The two must be 8 tiles away from each other, doesn't matter how close to the cc they are

Stats for level 1:
build cost: 1 mil gold
Build Time: 5 days
Space: 3x3 tiles
Hitpoints: 1000
Troop Space: 5
Range:8 tiles
Upgrade cost: 2.5 mil gold
Th level:9


Stats for level 2
Build Cost: 2.5 mil gold
Build Time: 8 days
Space: 3x3
Hitpoints:2000
Troop space: 11
Range: 8 tiles
Upgrade Cost: 3.5 mil gold
Th level:9

Stats for level 3
Build Cost: 3.5 mil gold
Build Time: 11 days
Space:3x3
Hitpoints: 2500
Troop Space: 17
Range:8 tiles
Upgrade cost: 5 mil gold
Th level: 9

Unlike CC, the troops will not stay if the rally point is destroyed even if the troops survive the defense

cmon this is an amazing idea

You have the clan castle and now you want more troops? Greedy much? It's a bad ide cause it will also unbalance the game. Also don't bump your own thread. It will get bumped on its own if other people like it

sorry bout the bump but what do you mean greedy, if you can put in your own troops solely for defensive purposes it makes the game more balanced if anything. It now makes the cc not entirely necessary to put in the middle, restricts wall space, and makes the game a thousand times harder on both sides. Also if you read my vampire troop idea, it could fit in perfectly.

The whole point of the cc is that you have to place it in the center because you only have one. Now people can't attack from one side of the base because they know there will be troops in both sides.

but it forces defenses to be more clustered and by the same token, luring is now easier and just takes more work... its a perfectly fine idea but thanks for your input

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cooper123

You have the clan castle and now you want more troops? Greedy much? It's a bad ide cause it will also unbalance the game. Also don't bump your own thread. It will get bumped on its own if other people like it

---

Or since in a normal cc you can fit 35 cc troops you can fit 15 cc troops in each

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FrosttN

Or since in a normal cc you can fit 35 cc troops you can fit 15 cc troops in each

---

what do you mean by this, I'm having trouble understanding what the point of saying this even is.

anyone else?......

Good idea. But if its like a mini clan castle, then it should start out, at lvl 1, being able to hold 5 troops, and add 5 every upgrade. In the end it should be able to hold a dragon. Thus, if you have 2 maxx mini cc and a lvl 3 cc, you can have 3 dragons defending your base! Genius!:cool:

This kind of idea is ruled out

Battle Related:
*Ability to filter matchmaking by resources or trophies available
*Capture live attackers and have them reassigned to your own clan castle, army camps, or new structure
*Bonus/award if attacker skips your village – partial payment to you on match fee
*On Offensive Battle Summary include resource cost of troops/spells used
*Ability to assign 5 or so of your own troops to defend Town Hall, same AI as CC, smaller radius
*Ability to transfer a revenge to a clan member or public hitlist
*Auto reset/repurchase traps if you win a defense (shield didn’t activate, still attackable)
*Add a small chance to “Steal/Win/Replace” spells on an attack victory (suggest 3-star only)
*Back button in matchmaking for accidental “Next” clicks – Perhaps cost double fee to return
*Deactivate spell selection after casting to avoid multiple mis-casts, make user re-select if wanted
*Add a 1-2 second spell casting cooldown to prevent unwanted multiple mis-casts

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jobro

Good idea. But if its like a mini clan castle, then it should start out, at lvl 1, being able to hold 5 troops, and add 5 every upgrade. In the end it should be able to hold a dragon. Thus, if you have 2 maxx mini cc and a lvl 3 cc, you can have 3 dragons defending your base! Genius!:cool:

---

That is exactly why this is a bad idea.

they are called rally points... but yes, thats the idea, and it would give the edge to the defender as SC always wants to make room for a new troop that can be more OP then usual

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hesto25

This kind of idea is ruled out

Battle Related:
*Ability to filter matchmaking by resources or trophies available
*Capture live attackers and have them reassigned to your own clan castle, army camps, or new structure
*Bonus/award if attacker skips your village – partial payment to you on match fee
*On Offensive Battle Summary include resource cost of troops/spells used
*Ability to assign 5 or so of your own troops to defend Town Hall, same AI as CC, smaller radius
*Ability to transfer a revenge to a clan member or public hitlist
*Auto reset/repurchase traps if you win a defense (shield didn’t activate, still attackable)
*Add a small chance to “Steal/Win/Replace” spells on an attack victory (suggest 3-star only)
*Back button in matchmaking for accidental “Next” clicks – Perhaps cost double fee to return
*Deactivate spell selection after casting to avoid multiple mis-casts, make user re-select if wanted
*Add a 1-2 second spell casting cooldown to prevent unwanted multiple mis-casts

---

this applies to th specifically, if a new 3x3 tiled building was made, it makes players castrate their wall usage further while allowing new troops to be balanced and introduced. It is actually a stroke of genius so yeah. Plus if you can have 3 drags in total on defense, but you only have lvl 1 drags, then you're screwed. The troops are for your own benefit and are optional. Lastly, it wastes time forcing you to be on the game more to check for when your troops are done to put into your rally point