Printable View
Look at you guys all proper uh spelling or grammar you tell me....oh wait you guys don't know the difference....but what u do know are the words that ur phone spell checks for you....you think I care about a misspelled word ( sure as heck ain't miss grammared) lol bunch of meatheads argue over misspelled words in grammatical context.....YOU SIMPLY DONT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE HAHABA WHAT A JOKEQuote:
Originally Posted by mhed
It was a terrible ideaQuote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix64
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourcei...e%20definitionQuote:
Originally Posted by trevor2127
Seriously, guys, quit bullying Trevor.
OMG this made me laugh so much xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDQuote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix64
STOP going off topic
Hm... But then, what would be the point of the 75 troop space in barracks? They already dealt with this by the wall update and the wall breaker update (They used to take up one space only).
But it seems like a sensible concept, to me.:)
Agreed. It does waste that space, but it does win the elixir problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix64
But then again, I suppose that if you wanted to train 7 barbs and then 24 spaces of wizards, you'd need all that space, huh...Quote:
Originally Posted by EpicChris
Maybe allow a 10% extra overflow, so you could train 220 troops with a 200 capacity, and always round down if the trainable number is not an integer.
This would definitely help elixir's economy out.
i agree that It will make usless space in barrack but look at the good side you will find more elixir on raiding which will fix a lot of loot problems soo it barrack space vs elixir i vote for the elixir:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by EpicChris
Interesting implementation. The 10% overflow would help people like farmers, who like to be training their next army while raiding.Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix64
But it also prevents hoarding on the barracks
Beautiful Elixir, I love you so :PQuote:
Originally Posted by mhed