Surrender/except buttons for leaders

For clan leaders i think they should have the ability to end a war. Some wars are just not fare to play out it happens. But we should have a out. Each leader has a button surrender/except button. The team surrenders. The opposite team can except. But before that has the ability to mount his attacks. Not fare to not let them get there loot. Once they've satisfied themselves excepts the surrender. Move the game forward get on with it. To many times they wait out the full 48 hours boring. I'm in one right know. Just saying

There are a few threads on this. The detractors will say that surrendering is bad for morale and even bad mismatches can still be won. Those are good points, but attacking a clan that is not fighting back is kinda boring after the first twenty or thirty times.

My clan is actually sitting out their first war ever. They (edit: the opponent) have the same number of th9s as us as well as a few really nice looking th10s to our 1 premmie. They'd have to be completely incompetent to lose.

Typically, any decent clan war will have every single th8 and below base 3-starred and the winner is determined by how the top holds out. There is only so much you can do when your target is a town hall level higher.

Kinda pointless talking about clan war improvements here. Sc and it's team of farmer helpers, only care about the raiders and their wants over the warriors. I do like this idea, but i guess we won't ever see it happen.

No no no no and NO! We want to collect loot off of them, not just 'Oops! We accidently pressed the surrender button!' I'd be quite PO'd if I was almost done training gowiwi and the other clan surrendered.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kittehhoard

No no no no and NO! We want to collect loot off of them, not just 'Oops! We accidently pressed the surrender button!' I'd be quite PO'd if I was almost done training gowiwi and the other clan surrendered.

---

Yeah, the op added a double negative. So stated we get the war loot. Unless of course his English is bad (except = accept? ) and meant no war loot.

They should make it like what u say but make it like the leader and co leaders or whole clan or majority must vote.

Wow the grammar hurts my eyes......


btw (if I understand what you're saying) this idea has been suggested many times and I just dont see it going very well. How mad would you be if you had a certain army set trained for that base and all of a sudden war is over just because the leader THINKS its "unfare"

Give it all you got, dont request for a quitter button.

Yep...no no no no no. Not gonna happen. Clans would just surrender until they find a matchup they can win, and the clan that wins because the other clan surrendered? What if they didn't have a chance to do their battles? Are they collecting loot for not even battling? It's not their fault they didn't get to attack.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ayyyyyema

Wow the grammar hurts my eyes......

---

Me too...and then I read the not from my kid's baseball coach...

Good win tonight for are boy's. Saturdays game is being moved to 6:00. If you're child will not be there please let me know ASAP. We are already down to 9 kids. Just let me know so I can call kids up from pony thanks.


This is not a good night for the English language.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by awesomness2016

Me too...and then I read the not from my kid's baseball coach...

Good win tonight for are boy's. Saturdays game is being moved to 6:00. If you're child will not be there please let me know ASAP. We are already down to 9 kids. Just let me know so I can call kids up from pony thanks.


This is not a good night for the English language.

---

Not = note? Nice fail