Printable View
Since that was clearly directed at me. That is not the case at all and not what I am arguing against. Keep on with your red herrings.:pQuote:
Originally Posted by badfish1979
Here is a vid of me nexting for a couple minutes and past villages out of my league when I happen upon a collector raid 2:32 in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBbx22WH2R4
So? Finding a raid after two minutes is acceptable, but if you aren't finding it repeatedly than it is meaningless. I found a 300k/300k/2k collector raid the other day on my first next, but loot still stinks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coathanger
What is loot that does not stink?Quote:
Originally Posted by LordAmbreon
Full storages and collectors put out of range of defenses, surrounded by flower beds and adorned with pink ribbon, obviously.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coathanger
I don't want to be another hungry fish that wants to attack the thread with why the loot sucks etc, rather it's pretty clear there are plenty of suggestions by people in the thread that are left unnoticed by SC so far such as 1 gem boost 24/7, getting rewarded for defending attacks etc. Before now I used to believe people were just being impatient with finding loot..but now that I'm pushing and progressing from gold 3 onwards as a th8 im starting to see the loot is god awful. some of the members in my clan are in masters+ and they say the loot is great up there and it seems like a big reason for that being the bonus loot is crazy compared to the little you receive in gold league or even crystal league. seems like the problem lies with where majority of loot is stashed currently and how it's being produced, leading to a bigger problem because majority of people can't push to masters league+ and therefore stuck in leagues much below..no matter the game is becoming less fun when I can't even afford to upgrade a cannon to lvl10 until 3-4 days of heavy loot searching.Quote:
Originally Posted by badfish1979
If more loot would be available, more people would be able to upgrade their base at a faster pace. An increase of better/stronger/more difficult bases enhances the challenge of grinding/farming faster than others by increasingly being pitted against strong bases with less dependency on RNG, but rather on skill. The end-result being an overall improved competitive environment where it becomes more difficult to defend your loot and take it from others. If you genuinely prefer competition and challenges, why would you advocate a system which favors disparity and lowers the level of said competition and challenges?Quote:
Originally Posted by Coathanger
No, you're missing the point. The subject is whether or not the loot is bad. Not whether or not Finland exists or if the Earth is flat. It's what do the majority of CoC players believe. Good or bad is never factual, it is always perspective.Quote:
Originally Posted by Coathanger
Let's be real, you and a couple others are arguing the loot isn't bad, but its clear from a debate standpoint none of you are arguing it for the sake of the subject. You argue for the sake of debate. You're picking apart the logic of a sound reasoning solely to be right. Not because you are right, but because you want to win the "sport", in your words! I'm sure you'll argue that to though won't you (rhetorical question-meaning I don't care if you respond).
I think by "easy mode" he means the fact that in this game, no matter how well developed and advanced your base is, you can always drop trophies and play in the baby leagues, crushing little bases while you grind away the profit, however little or large that might be.Quote:
Originally Posted by badfish1979
That is the easy mode in this game and that's what the huge majority of players do; pray on weaklings.
It would make more sense to make it worthwhile to attack bases as strong as yours, maybe rewards equivalent to the % you destroy and not just getting what the player has (or doesnt have) in their storages. That way you can grind away with your gowiwis all you want and get a reward thats fair.
Balance. Part of the game is the time it takes which shows your commitment and separates you from others. If you want an even playing field pick up an FPS without any sort of leveling system. Like Q3 arena.Quote:
Originally Posted by Onomatopoeia
Furthermore at any point in time players can pit themselves against others at their level negating what is described as a disparity.
I said nothing about Finland or the Earth being flat. What are you going on about?Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenR86
You're doing it wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneSplice
If 9/10 people in this forum claim loot is bad for them, it means loot is bad for 9/10 people in this forum.
If 1/10 people claim loot is good, it means 1/10 people in the forum are satisfied with the loot.
That's all.
If you were making a highly profitable game and, following changes you introduced, 9/10 of your customers started saying you made THEIR game experience worst or boring, maybe you'd listen.
Or not, if you were making more money after the changes.
SuperCell is not Santa Claus. It's a multi Billion dollar company trying to milk the game for as much as it can. It's their job to stretch the limits of how much they can make people pay without driving too many away. It's a fine balance.