The NEW one and only loot is good or bad thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by THNSUM

I have been puzzling that in my mind as well. This is one possibility I've came up with.

Previously players used thier elixir to raid. From the raids they collected gold to do upgrades. ( and do more raids)

now they are using thier elixir for raids AND to upgrade walls, this means fewer raids and less gold collected. What gold is collected is still used for upgrades but because they collect less, they have less stockpiled for future upgrades.

Thoughts ?

---

It doesnt explain lack of gold per raid, only less elixer per raid. The fact is the recent update didn't cause a gold problem. Elixer for walls was a good addition.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 2222

It doesnt explain lack of gold per raid, only less elixer per raid. The fact is the recent update didn't cause a gold problem. Elixer for walls was a good addition.

---

Actually, it does. A lot of people I've talked to say they dump both elixir AND gold into walls before logging out for the night so that they don't have extra resources sitting there to be raided.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 2222

It doesnt explain lack of gold per raid, only less elixer per raid. The fact is the recent update didn't cause a gold problem. Elixer for walls was a good addition.

---

It really does explain the lack of gold,all of those what must be millions of additional nexts don't add up to nothing.Think about this and get back to us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anoushka

If we weren't doing anything or even thinking about this subject, we would say it plainly, explain the reason and close every thread related to the current topic - that is not the case here. However, I’m not gonna publicly discuss every meeting we have with the team, every idea or suggestion proposed (that might or might not see the light of the day) and especially not going to give you the idea that the most revolutionary loot change is coming, when it can be far from it.

As soon as we have a more concrete response we will be more than glad to inform everyone and I know this is disappointing to you (+ that this sort of answers from us = nothing) but until then “we’re looking into it” is the only thing I can say

---

Hi Anoushka, there has been a large percentage of players/forumers that have been upset since Decembers update when farming became more and more difficult to do.

1- The removal of inactives villages.
2- Loot update that lets more get stollen from you than you can re-generate whilst under a shield.
3- Clan Wars that costs more resources than you can win.
4- Collectors/mines output that has not increased since TH8 was the maximum.

Need I go on.

SC repeatedly mentions they are looking in to it and are reluctant to add more resources (repeatedly mentioned since Decembers loot "update") because it would make the game too easy.

I for one think SC recent "improvements" to the game's economy have been detrimental to the game. I hope they change tact soon. I love this game but I am playing less and less. I am finding it like a second job to progress in it. Simply no fun anymore.

Yup when larger upgrades come you don't have enough time to raid over a couple million so you dump it in walls. I sit with no balance much like the rest of CoC. If it doesn't change I'll just CW tell I'm bored on my stagnated base.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by S3an

Hi Anoushka, there has been a large percentage of players/forumers that have been upset since Decembers update when farming became more and more difficult to do.

1- The removal of inactives villages.
2- Loot update that lets more get stollen from you than you can re-generate whilst under a shield.
3- Clan Wars that costs more resources than you can win.
4- Collectors/mines output that has not increased since TH8 was the maximum.

Need I go on.

SC repeatedly mentions they are looking in to it and are reluctant to add more resources (repeatedly mentioned since Decembers loot "update") because it would make the game too easy.

I for one think SC recent "improvements" to the game's economy have been detrimental to the game. I hope they change tact soon. I love this game but I am playing less and less. I am finding it like a second job to progress in it. Simply no fun anymore.

---

This is perfect. Getting loot has become too difficult and not fun. I have to "next" on average 40-50 times to find a base that gives over 80k in each resource. "Nexting" is NOT fun!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by S3an

Hi Anoushka, there has been a large percentage of players/forumers that have been upset since Decembers update when farming became more and more difficult to do.

1- The removal of inactives villages.
2- Loot update that lets more get stollen from you than you can re-generate whilst under a shield.
3- Clan Wars that costs more resources than you can win.
4- Collectors/mines output that has not increased since TH8 was the maximum.

Need I go on.

SC repeatedly mentions they are looking in to it and are reluctant to add more resources (repeatedly mentioned since Decembers loot "update") because it would make the game too easy.

I for one think SC recent "improvements" to the game's economy have been detrimental to the game. I hope they change tact soon. I love this game but I am playing less and less. I am finding it like a second job to progress in it. Simply no fun anymore.

---

1-Inactives are raided everyday. There are less at higher town hall levels.
2-Decently developed villages are not regularly 3 starred (unless they are playing out of their league) causing the loss of so much loot. If you are losing all your storages at th9-10 on a regular basis you can change that.
3-Change your army comp?
4-Completely false. When th9 came into the game so did level 11 collectors After th10 was around for a bit they got extra collectors.

I don't see why supercell would take so long to fix the loot problem?! You just put out 1 gem boost for temporary fix, why not just give us collectors level 12, especially we have new level 7 troops and arch towers!! Or you just want people to gem all those new stuff! You don't have to be a rocket scientist to fix the loot problem, it's more like a greedy decision from the management, who doesn't give a damn about the players!! Pathetic!,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Coathanger

1-Inactives are raided everyday. There are less at higher town hall levels.
2-Decently developed villages are not regularly 3 starred (unless they are playing out of their league) causing the loss of so much loot. If you are losing all your storages at th9-10 on a regular basis you can change that.
3-Change your army comp?
4-Completely false. When th9 came into the game so did level 11 collectors After th10 was around for a bit they got extra collectors.

---

1-
2-
3-
4- there is no argument that the loot gained is in any way adequate to most players. Just because you're probably a developed th10 doesn't mean you have rip on people who want loot availability like it was when you got your TH to 10

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordAngus9180

I don't see why supercell would take so long to fix the loot problem?! You just put out 1 gem boost for temporary fix, why not just give us collectors level 12, especially we have new level 7 troops and arch towers!! Or you just want people to gem all those new stuff! You don't have to be a rocket scientist to fix the loot problem, it's more like a greedy decision from the management, who doesn't give a damn about the players!! Pathetic!,

---

Because sc is one of the greediest game companies ever. They're tied for first with EA.