The NEW one and only loot is good or bad thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lloopy14

I just want to clarify.... 300K collector base - combined gold & elixir.. or just one of each

---

300k of both, but I'd settle for 215k of each, which is usually how the cookie crumbles.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordAmbreon

300k of both, but I'd settle for 215k of each, which is usually how the cookie crumbles.

---

Thanks. May sound like a silly question but a few months ago when people discussed loot they were talking gold only. I was thinking 300K gold at first glance!

So just got my level seven lab. The costs were lower than I thought, but it may as well have been 100 million for level 6 archers, because the loot simply isn't there to find.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarkHero

People keep saying that loot at th10 is horrible, no they are not. You need to get yourself in the right range to find loot like these(pictures below). This is how much loot i'm getting everyday, the pictures below are for today. And my advice is to boost your spell factory if you need it otherwise no need to boost anything else.

---

I did a few quick calculations...have a look

(please excuse the text visibillity, didn't wanna spend too much time on this)

http://i.imgur.com/zjqAj8w.jpg

Basically, your collectors on their own outperformed you when it came to Elixir and DE.
On gold, you managed 1.2 million over 27 hours


If you still think this is 'good' loot' I fear for all the months you've spent on this game thinking you were getting good loot.

Wanna know another way to tell if you're not doing good loot-wise? It's at the top of the screen,3 builders doing nothing.

Nice math application there ^^^^^^^^^^

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordAmbreon

Nice math application there ^^^^^^^^^^

---

Thanks! I had to use fingers AND toes!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BezG

I did a few quick calculations...have a look

Basically, your collectors on their own outperformed you when it came to Elixir and DE.
On gold, you managed 1.2 million over 27 hours


If you still think this is 'good' loot' I fear for all the months you've spent on this game thinking you were getting good loot.

Wanna know another way to tel you're not doing good loot-wise? It's at the top of the screen, 4 builders doing nothing.

---

Very flawed comparison: it's not like he was active for 27 hours straight, unlike collectors ... Evidently he raids, logs off and does the same in an hour or so. And if he's a decent TH10, it's unlikely he will easily get raided within an hour if his TH is inside at that trophy range. If this has been his style of play all the time, I wouldn't be surprised if he actually has not noticed a considerable difference in loot.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BezG

I did a few quick calculations...have a look

(please excuse the text visibillity, didn't wanna spend too much time on this)

http://i.imgur.com/zjqAj8w.jpg

Basically, your collectors on their own outperformed you when it came to Elixir and DE.
On gold, you managed 1.2 million over 27 hours


If you still think this is 'good' loot' I fear for all the months you've spent on this game thinking you were getting good loot.

Wanna know another way to tell if you're not doing good loot-wise? It's at the top of the screen,3 builders doing nothing.

---

👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆

exactly... People are so brainwashed to now accept terrible loot.. Those raids are terrible... Factoring in nexting costs, those are absolutely abysmal numbers and gems were used for that as well... Literally, collectors did nearly as much gold in all likelihood and crushed his elixir and de gains...


What people fail to understand is that unless you are saving elixir for a big elixit upgrade there will BE NO ELIXIR AT ALL in storages unless they are full lava walls!!

Waiting until everyone has full lava walls for elixir to come back to the game? That is insane.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Onomatopoeia

Very flawed comparison: it's not like he was active for 27 hours straight, unlike collectors ... Evidently he raids, logs off and does the same in an hour or so. And if he's a decent TH10, it's unlikely he will easily get raided within an hour if his TH is inside at that trophy range. If this has been his style of play all the time, I wouldn't be surprised if he actually has not noticed a considerable difference in loot.

---

Then his post is pointless and irrelevant to the discussion if used to try and prove that "loot is good," since we have no real timeframe to go on. How many times did he press the next button before finding each raid? How long was he actually online? Since this cannot be determined by looking at the screenshots, the screenshots prove nothing.

Not to mention the net loss of elixir.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by badfish1979

Then his post is pointless and irrelevant to the discussion if used to try and prove that "loot is good," since we have no real timeframe to go on. How many times did he press the next button before finding each raid? How long was he actually online? Since this cannot be determined by looking at the screenshots, the screenshots prove nothing.

---

"Loot is good" or "loot is bad" is pretty relative the begin with and can greatly vary depending on different factors such as what you consider as "good or bad loot", playstyle, the time of the day you play, trophy range, luck, etc. So his post is as much relevant as other people's posts since there is no benchmark for good loot within a certain timeframe.

Basically I could barch for an hour straight and get 2 million gold, but if you spread that 2 million over a timespan of 27 hours, then I will have a poor return.