If you don't like your leader just leave. If this was implemented, people would just troll clans esp. the open ones.
Printable View
If you don't like your leader just leave. If this was implemented, people would just troll clans esp. the open ones.
Co-leaders kick leader they don't like, the co-leader that becomes leader gets kicked by other co-leaders... aaaand this cycle never ends.
If you have an inactive leader... Get a new clan.
Of course you shouldn't be able to kick people with a higher rank than you, that would completely defeat the purpose of having ranks...
First, you do have a valid point here. HOWEVER, I disagree because of one (I believe :cool:) main reason: This ability would be abused far too often. Think of it this way: One co-leader is power-hungry and wants that leadership posistion. All he has to do is promote 4 of his friends (Or strangers who want the Co-leader spot), and the vote out the leader. Then, a few days later, one of the other Co-leaders does the same thing to him and so on. You can imagine the chaos and confusion this would create! There is no perfect answer, but I still believe that leaving and making/joining a new clan would be the better option. Maybe you could change your request to having a sort-of democracy system, where the entire clan can vote, with higher ranks getting more votes, or an ability for Co-leaders to warn the Leader that they will leave if he continues being an inactive leader. Great idea, though. Sorry about sorta bashing it. Just don't agree with you on this point. ;)
I disagree with players kicking leaders. Leaders are supposed to be the player with the highest rank in the clan. If you do not like your leader, just find a different clan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aldoofbanga
I think they are doing the first one already.
The second one is not bad. I still don't think there should be any action a co leader or lower could take to unset a leader. But having something not controlled by users that demotes them if they simply have not signed in after a certain time might be acceptable.
Speaking for myself, I am probably not waiting the time. if the leader has vanished and a couple weeks have gone by I am likely to have taken my own action and not waited for any auto-demote. But thats me.
Good idea! But I think that it could be abused, a lot. People could find a clan with a bunch of good people wanting to keep their clan small and refined, and then just vote the leader out, even if he/she was a good leader. The point of being a leader is that you are the leader, the highest rank. It's a dictatorship, not a democracy.
Agreed. I am a very high level player. I run my own clan and am happy there (and I believe they are too) so we live in peace. But I do in global get offered ridiculous things because guys over rate how important my high level would be to have in their clan. (It really matters less than guys think, it does not, especially not in war, 'make them strong')Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOutrageousPuffin
Based on what I get said to me in global (automatic co if I join all the time even though they don't even know me) I think I could (if they did this) easily go into a lot of clans, tell them I will only stay if I get voted to leader, then after I get it troll the clan. I myself would not do such a despicable thing, but there are many that would.
The leader is most often the founder, kicking the founder out is just wrong. The best course of action is quit the Clan and find one more to your liking.:cool:
If you can't stand critism then don't join the forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardwire