Leaving during a war is plain rude and the penalty for leaving during a war should be that the offender should not be able to join another clan for one week.
Printable View
Leaving during a war is plain rude and the penalty for leaving during a war should be that the offender should not be able to join another clan for one week.
this would be my thought: if someone does not use both of their war attacks AND is not in the clan when the war ends, they are given a double length war codlin. only idea I can think of.
This would be a very cruel and unusual punishment. You wanna know where cruel and unusual punishments are deemed illegal. The great United States of America. People also leave clans for legit reasons, and then come back to attack. They might leave to help out their sister clan, or to visit a friends, or even to get better troops. Even though it may be rude (only if they dont come back) doesnt mean you can just ban them from joining a clan for a week.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cisco1208
P.S. Please dont necro old threads.
Love it! Maybe not make the leave button unavailable. But they should not be able to join another clan for 72 hours seems fair.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leotidus
Deserters is a clan leader mistake, do not add strangers to wars. If your clan leader do bad war casting need demote button or kick out that bad one.
Or your clan is so bad, if members leaving?
Kid leader? Jealous on troops? Red war log? Do not punish others for your own mistakes.
Some other online games I have played have a search resource that has players clan or alliance history.
If this was available it would highlight jumpers and leaders could make decisions with more information.
I think some of the issues could be fixed if Clan search had more categories to help refine the process of finding a clan that your happy to stay in.
This is needed
who leaves the clan during the war, at the beginning of the war was green shield, deserves punishment, with confirmation of the clan leader, to make sure abandonment.
No. No need any punishment. This is childish. If someone don't want to war - he get 0 stars. So, need it?
Clan leader must plan war. If not - maybe need leader punishment? If clan see, what childish leader do a lot of mistakes, taking to war strangers, maybe better kick out him?
I fully agree to thread creator. Why not these leachers should be punished who only join to bluff clanmates for troops and quit during war. Every war costs too much for those who fill cc and then its very irritating if anyone leave without making attack. Though all war participants can make attack even if one choose to leave so it's just a matter of ethic and loyality. No state rules out penalizing to defaulters.