The people should attack guys with the appropriate level, not trophies.
Printable View
The people should attack guys with the appropriate level, not trophies.
Is the loot penalty not helping enough?Quote:
Originally Posted by YOLOShukaru3D
Stop farming, you say?
Ok.
*shuts off Hay Day*
Hahaha, clever.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenn
lolol that's funny :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenn
Ahahah you just made my day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenn
That said, there is a loot penalty. Look it up on the clash of clans wiki.
Okay, I won't play hay day. I'll convince other people to stop as well.
I'll play clash and farm there.:rolleyes:
Stop farming you say Mmmmmm........so we should all pay thousands of dollars in gems to get up, or spend 4X the amount of time to get up? Gonna take a hard pass on that
I am going to respond to this brilliant idea with a resounding... No. I disagree. I have seen a town hall 3 in masters league. Who does he have to attack besides about at most 20 others? No one. And no raiding high town halls for lots of loot besides!
Farming is a part of many players strategy. To take farming out, that will cause a lot of trouble for many players. And how do you suggest SuperCell to stop players from farming?
you are stupid
I like farmers. Especially when they leave their TH out in the open. Gives me free trophies so I can loot more people. I can take a hit on trophies whenever I find a village with lots of resources. Don't have to worry about losing. Haven't spent one cent on the game. Oh and I make sure not to destroy too much. I didn't want to give away free shields :)
I agree but CoC is a distorted game and people have learned to take advantage of the distortions.Quote:
Originally Posted by YOLOShukaru3D
The loot penalty should be based on level not TH level. Someone can rush a TH but still be very week. There should be a level penalty not a trophy penalty. Trophies can come and go. Their is a person in my clan with a TH 7 that sniped his way up to masters to collect the gems. Trophies don't really mean anything. You can't spend them.
People that put their TH outside the wall so they will be sniped to get an almost free shield should be penalized more. Currently all THs hold the same amount of loot. This is stupid. A TH9 should hold many more times the loot of a TH4. If a TH9 held 100,000 gold and 100,000 elixir and 1000 dark elixir players may thing twice about put their TH9s outside the walls.
I am currently a level 84/ crystal 2 player. I put my TH outside the walls because people are so desperate for trophies they snipe me and provide a shield. I lose only 1000 gold and 1000 elixir at most. This is insane but I will keep doing it as long as SC permits this distortion to continue or I lose interest in the game because of the distortions.
BTW, I only snipe those higher level players that have attacked me first. I will zap their DE too but I don't snipe and zap otherwise. I think it is low and only works because SC allows this distortion.
I disagree, if the person wants to rush the townhall and have access to the best troops and defences then they have to be prepared to suffer the loot penalty that goes along with it. I think to base matchmaking of level would not work as it doesn't really relate to base strength and if it was implemented people would instantly stop donating troops to try and keep levels down and find easier matches.Quote:
Originally Posted by bad4u
for me the big problem with removing farming is that there are a lot of players like myself who are paying 3 million for wall upgrades and 8 million for most other upgrades not to mention the dark elixir, we simply would not be able to continue playing the game due to the many thousands of dollars it would cost in gems to keep upgrading our bases. The lowest i will farm is a th8 which is one town hall level below me otherwise the loot penalty makes it not worth it.