Where did I say that? Maybe because I have a few thousand posts, you think I'm the boss here? I have no idea what you're trying to say.
You're telling people to look at the poll, but the poll says nothing.
Printable View
Removing the the clan simply cleans up the amount of clans that exist, and also encourage people to be more active! It's not a dictatorship: No one is putting a gun to their head and telling them that they HAVE TO play, it's their choice. If they don't, they just don't have a clan anymore. Also, it isn't a specific person, it's the WHOLE CLAN that has to be inactive in order for it to be disbanded!
Due to that, no harm will be done as any active players will have left the inactive clan long before it is disbanded. (Who wants to be in an inactive clan??!!)
What do you mean the poll shows nothing? Out of 17 people, 9 agree with this notion, 5 do NOT, 1 has his own version, and the rest are in a sense, neutral. Almost double of the voters like this idea! So stop being a spoil-sport and open your eyes! The amount of voters may not be much, but Rome wasn't built in a day! I created this thread like 4 hours ago 😂
No, not a dictatorship, but you would be dispensing consequences if I don't play/behave a certain way, in this case being to inactive. So once again, it is my choice to be inactive, for what ever reason, if I wish, and therefore should not be punished in any way.
Further, you are attempting to justify this idea be stating that every member needs to show a certain amount of inactivity. How does one determine the reason for another's inactivity and avoid punishing the innocent?
Honestly, I think this would really irritate people. What if someone's wi-fi goes out and will take a long time to fix? Goes on a long vacation without wi-fi? Ect. As said, the clan has a right to exist as long as it hasn't been manually dis-banned by the leader.