Printable View
I don't know if "War Hopper" is the universal name for people who jump clans after a war or two, but I think something should be done about it. I think that if a person leaves before the war is over they do not receive any of their war loot. But what if i get kicked you may ask. If the person is kicked they should still receive their share of the war loot because it was not their decision to leave.
This is a proposal I might be able to get behind. It seems reasonable. Although I'd go a step further and say this only happens if they don't use their attacks.
I mean if they just attack once and then leave and the clan has to struggle to get a win and if they do win that person still gets his loot even though he put them in a tough spot. That shouldn't be allowed.Quote:
Originally Posted by dahimi
I dunno. One attack at least means they did something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger826
Whether the person attacked or not, they still barely get any loot if the clan loses. Thus, they will still have to try and contribute their share to the clan to get by his hopping needs.
Why shouldn't they? They obiously only got the loot for doon previous work. If they did only 1 attack tey only got half the loot. Both, then they did their work