Just curious how this poll would come in.
Printable View
Just curious how this poll would come in.
you said prefer
thats why i chose the easy target enemy clan
because everyone prefer easy war
but sometimes we like to take a challenge and want hard clan
i think if the clan wars turned to all tough wars people will quit warring
its like playing a game in the hard mode all the time , boring and annoying
I'd rather a close war and lose than a landslide any day.
id prefer the win. in general I don't really care the overall war outcome. I just like attacking in them 'cause I get to see how my clans best attacks stack up against their best defense layouts and vice versa instead of farmers. whether we win or lose is just a bonus, and ill take the loot.
I don't like easy wins. not one bit. but I don't like losing either. So, for any given clan war, I would prefer a close match-up; win or lose. The problem with the poll is that implies that if I choose option 2, then I am preferring to lose, and that is certainly not the case. Easy wars suck. We are doing one right now. The other clan has really bad participation. I don't even really want to attack because we are up by like 40 or so stars and it just doesn't matter. My attack counts for nothing and the only village left to get three starred is a th6(for some weird reason...).
I didn't vote because I would prefer neither. At least not if it was every war.
It speaks to who is in it for the joy of winning, and who is in it for the thrill of competing. Not everyone prefers an easy war, I don't and obviously the guy above me does not either. I find an easy war to be non entertaining and a waste of 2 days. I am usually mad that I have to sit through it while I hope the next one is tougher.
I play games in hard mode all the time. I find anything less to be boring and annoying.
Not many of votes but thus far the poll disagrees with me. Noted.
Sadly many people here on forums make it VERY clear that the only thing they care about are getting the wins in their stats.
- Stacking their clans in a way to ensure mismatches and wins every war. This is not hard and many people take advantage of it in different ways
- Being against the opt out button because they are worried... er, I mean opposed that this means lazy clans will now be harder opponents.
- Even when it comes to personal war stats people flaunt there star count even though they only prey on those much weaker every war.
- etc etc
Our latest war was a joke. The mismatch was the worst I have ever seen. We got a perfect score after 11 attacks (one was a hilarious screw up) and it was not even a challenge. 20%-30% of all the wars I've been in have been this way and trust me when I say they are boring and I would NEVER want these. The best few wars I've been in were when they went down to the wire with both sides fighting hard.
I know a lot of these clans with 60+ wins must be well organised and great in attack and defense... but at the same time I have a feeling that many have just stacked their clans to get the wins in order to feel superior while flaunting it on forums. I've looked through the make up of a lot of these clans and with a few of them it is just obvious.
Whatever helps people sleep better at night I suppose. Give me a hard fought battle win or lose over a landslide any day. I don't war for loot, I war for a challenge. Perhaps the MM will provide that more consistently one of these days..
I'd like both really to be honest, we all love the easy landslide victory's as we get an easy bonus right? But when we have a couple of them it does get boring so then we want a hard toe 2 toe war.
I'd prefer both. :cool:
I enjoy competition.