Limit number of attack per season

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

August 29th, 2014
o0oAnnyo0o

Quote:

Originally Posted by D3X

This is stupid, just say it and let the moderators cut it out. It's making this thread a whole bunch of ? ? ? :confused: where no one gets the point. Might as well close this thread if you don't say. How are you going to convince or have any support on here when nobody understands your point?

You keep hanging this clause over us and you're making a lot of us confused. I'm trying to grasp what you're saying, and I may even know what you're talking about, but I don't see how any of this appies to ♥♥♥♥bunny.

Well, the moment I say what is it about, Mod would kill the topic, like every other topic. That's the problem.

But disregard all of that, if a ceiling number is greater than 95%, or even as far as 98%, 99% of the number of attack per season throughout coc history, how would it effects anyone that badly? And if it doesn't effects anyone negatively, why would anyone care??? Especially if it would solve the unfairness and might help the loot problem.
August 29th, 2014
D3X

Quote:

Originally Posted by o0oAnnyo0o

Well, the moment I say what is it about, Mod would kill the topic, like every other topic. That's the problem.

But disregard all of that, if a ceiling number is greater than 95%, or even as far as 98%, 99% of the number of attack per season throughout coc history, how would it effects anyone that badly? And if it doesn't effects anyone, why would anyone care??? Especially if it would solve the unfairness and might help the loot problem.

Then what's the point? for that 1-2% to build such a mechanism? such a waste of time

so is it fluffybunny you're talking about or something different?
August 29th, 2014
o0oAnnyo0o

Quote:

Originally Posted by D3X

Then what's the point? for that 1-2% to build such a mechanism? such a waste of time

so is it fluffybunny you're talking about or something different?

No, it's not aim to hurt that 1,2%. That 1,2% is the one who got the negative consequence of the ceiling. Feel sorry for them, but...
August 29th, 2014
rdtx2012

you speed limit analogy is a bad one...

you raise the speed limits, people will go faster towards the speed limit. you cause more chaos and more accidents.

you set the attack limit so high that no one cares except a select few.. great.. the select few just go to max and that's it.. but what gain does the community get from those select few that reach max and cannot attack anymore?

Nothing. They won't notice. So why waste development time to add the line of code and to test it just for a handful of players in the bucket?
August 29th, 2014
paddy1888

Quote:

Originally Posted by D3X

This is stupid, just say it and let the moderators cut it out. It's making this thread a whole bunch of ? ? ? :confused: where no one gets the point. Might as well close this thread if you don't say. How are you going to convince or have any support on here when nobody understands your point?

You keep hanging this clause over us and you're making a lot of us confused. I'm trying to grasp what you're saying, and I may even know what you're talking about, but I don't see how any of this appies to ♥♥♥♥bunny.

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy1888

Back to my first reply to your thread, yes I agree that something needs to be done to stop the ♥♥♥♥♥ that people are using to keep them online, build troops and raid for them, (Yes i mentioned that thing we can't talk about, hopefully this nonsensical thread will be closed) but limiting the amount of raids someone can do is not, in my opinion right or wrong, the way to go about it. If someone can che@t the system then someone can che@t the che@t. Supercell should clamp down on this but limiting the amount of raids someone can do could cost Supercell money through people gemming troops, spells, heroes and other things.

Looks like you skim through posts too lol.
August 29th, 2014
D3X

Quote:

Originally Posted by o0oAnnyo0o

No, it's not aim to hurt that 1,2%. That 1,2% is the one who got the negative consequence of the ceiling. Feel sorry for them, but...

I will say it in this way: Before people have to wash their clothes by hand. But with the development of the technology, people can simple put clothes in washing machine, push a button, and the clothes is wash for them. So some people just let the washing machine run all the time. It would run so so many circle in 2 week period that normally you can't wash that much clothes.

Ok I understand English might not be your first language, maybe this is where the communication issue is arising.

So you're suggesting that there is an automated /BOT attack tool that raids. I call B.S. Are you seriously suggesting one that automatically raids? That does not exist.

Quote:

Originally Posted by paddy1888

Looks like you skim through posts too lol.

I might have scanned through yours a bit too quickly.
August 29th, 2014
o0oAnnyo0o

May you please edit your previous post. It will get this thread disappear. If it's not exist, why do I have to worry that this thread will be delete by Mod? I will remove my washing machine post, also. It's a dead giveaway
August 29th, 2014
D3X

Quote:

Originally Posted by o0oAnnyo0o

May you please edit your previous post. It will get this thread disappear. If it's not exist, why do I have to worry that this thread will be delete by Mod? I will remove my washing machine post, also. It's a dead giveaway

LOL! I give up. So you're making a suggestion(and a poor one at that) to fix a problem that you cannot openly talk about? Then there is no problem.
August 29th, 2014
o0oAnnyo0o

Quote:

Originally Posted by D3X

LOL! I give up. So you're making a suggestion(and a poor one at that) to fix a problem that you cannot openly talk about? Then there is no problem.

Well, if it's not exist, Mod would not care if we talk about it. The fact that Mod cares prove that it's exist. They don't want it to spread.

And I agree that my solution is a poorly one. I even said that it's only a band-aid. But a band aid that doesn't hurt anyone, and stopping the cancer getting too serious, would it be great?

The best of both world would be SC be able to stop that completely, but I honestly don't think they can.
August 29th, 2014
paddy1888

Quote:

Originally Posted by o0oAnnyo0o

May you please edit your previous post. It will get this thread disappear. If it's not exist, why do I have to worry that this thread will be delete by Mod? I will remove my washing machine post, also. It's a dead giveaway

It is already on the road to disappearing, a mod has moved it to the ideas and future requests section of the forum, if you haven't already noticed.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page