Limit number of attack per season

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

August 29th, 2014
lionheartferrer

Quote:

Originally Posted by gallantblade

Given the attack suggestion is very generous I like it.

The game should be promoting ways to kick people off for playing too much. It's not health to play games 24/7 kids.

I agree with this. It just isnt healthy anymore if all they do is play COC. Specially for students
August 29th, 2014
Incurso

not sure if trolling or serious

what would you do if you were supercell and someone suggest to you this idea? you would think that is terrible and wont happen ever. why would you limit a player from playing as much as he wants, generating income to the company? seriously, people who has thousands of attacks won invest money in the game boosting, do you seriously think that they will even remotely consider limiting them?

no
August 29th, 2014
lionheartferrer

Quote:

Originally Posted by badfish1979

I know there are some members with highly-gifted intelligences on this forum. It would be very helpful if they weighed in.

At 25,555 attacks and 20,160 minutes, his attacking rate is 1.267 attacks per minute. Or you can put it as, 1 attack per 47 seconds.
August 29th, 2014
Evadykaens

Quote:

Originally Posted by lionheartferrer

I agree with this. It just isnt healthy anymore if all they do is play COC. Specially for students

Contrary to some people's beliefs, it is not the responsibility of gaming companies to control gaming addictions.

You don't see xbox having an auto shut down feature after 6 hours of continuous running.
August 29th, 2014
Japperan123

Sorry, but not a good idea
August 29th, 2014
Coathanger

Quote:

Originally Posted by badfish1979

Did he ever lose a lose a single attack during those two weeks? Let's assume he won every single attack of his 3818 attacks.

There are 20160 minutes in a two-week period. Divide that by 3818 and you get 5.

Which means he won an attack every 5 minutes, 24/7, for two weeks straight.

When did he sleep? When did he do ANYTHING other than train armies, press the next button until he found a suitable raid, then complete a raid that can take up to 3 minutes during that time?

Even if this was physically possible (which I question), is this a valid argument against setting a REASONABLE limit on the number of attacks?

Let us not assume. Making assumptions here leads to serious flaws. The first flawed assumption of this thread is that attacks won in season is a reasonable identifier that someone is cheeting. It has also been assumed there is a need to set a limit on how many times someone can attack in a season.

Do not assume they are always using a full army for attacks. Do not assume anything especially that a high number of attacks is enough evidence someone is cheeting. If you look at the OP of the linked thread the dude had 2900+ 5 days into the season according to his link at the bottom of the post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by badfish1979

Do you guys even know what the purpose of the "personal break" is?

Just because something is physically possible, doesn't mean it's healthy.

There are also other reasons....

The sole purpose of the personal break is to prevent players from staying online all the time and removing themselves from match making. They are not parenting the players and they are not worried about individuals exhibiting unhealthy behavior.
August 29th, 2014
Herpacleese

There is a reasonable explaination of players with high wins in a season. With a bit of imagination you all can figure it out, but i will refrain from explaining at the moment, because, as a player who is currently bored with the game, perhaps I will challenge myself to this debatable issue and come back to this thread with evidence and the explaination.

I will say that if using my method, one could attain 2,500+/- wins in two weeks while raiding only three hours per day.
August 29th, 2014
Evadykaens

Quote:

Originally Posted by badfish1979

Do you guys even know what the purpose of the "personal break" is?

Just because something is physically possible, doesn't mean it's healthy.

There are also other reasons....

Personal break is to prevent a player from hiding behind an online shield and not get attacked.

You are mistaken if you think that SC went out of their way to ensure the well being of their players' health.

If i was SC, i couldn't care less if my top gem buyer used all his savings to buy gems and is currently sleeping under a pedestrian bridge, nor do i care that he is at the brink of losing his eyesight from constant exposure to his iDevice playing my game.
August 29th, 2014
lionheartferrer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herpacleese

There is a reasonable explaination of players with high wins in a season. With a bit of imagination you all can figure it out, but i will refrain from explaining at the moment, because, as a player who is currently bored with the game, perhaps I will challenge myself to this debatable issue and come back to this thread with evidence and the explaination.

I will say that if using my method, one could attain 2,500+/- wins in two weeks while raiding only three hours per day.

2500 attacks for 2520 minutes means you will attack every minute (for 3 hours a day, 2 weeks). I know its possible.
August 29th, 2014
Herpacleese

Quote:

Originally Posted by lionheartferrer

2500 attacks for 2520 minutes means you will attack every minute (for 3 hours a day, 2 weeks). I know its possible.

Yes, and with the generous estimate of one win every minute and enough players using that account, 25,000 wins in two weeks isn't impossible.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page