After the hero "nerfs" do you think that it would be reasonable to lower the healing time?
Printable View
After the hero "nerfs" do you think that it would be reasonable to lower the healing time?
naw. its annoying to have to wait. but in the long run it doesnt really effect my attack strategies. I try to only use my BK when I really want to 3star a base. So I use better armies which have longer cook times and spells which also take time if I plan to use my hero. The hero has plenty of time to nap and heal if I need to cook several spells.
I don't know how long it takes for higher lv hero's but i find it pretty ridicules having to wait at least an hour if not longer for a lv 4 king to heal.
You do realize that these nerfs were requested by actual forumers and supported by lots others right? Its not their fault about the nerfs. Anyways i think the time is good enough tbh and imo, but just imo
That would balance out the new update and lessen the new update hate... Perhaps
Decreasing the time would allow players to attack more increasing the time players are online. Isn't that what supercell wants. I don't get why making players wait 3 hours for spells and heroes is going to help them earn money.
When you get your heroes higher than kindergarten ask yourself the same question.Quote:
Originally Posted by DragonX101
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecalmclasher
At higher cups you need to raid with your heroes, if you are waiting on them to heal most players will gem them so that they can have them in the next raid.
waiting on heroes---> heal ---> gems---$$$$$
Yes everyone asked for every hero level above 5 to be nerfed.Quote:
Originally Posted by DragonX101
Weird how they got "nerfed" but yet work better than before. Those are my favorite kind of nerfs.