More ranks then just elder and co-leader....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordSquiggles

If i had a dollar for evey time someone posts that coc needed new ranks like it was a new idea... Id get OVER 9000 dollars

---

Then maybe supercell should give the leaders more control over the ranking like I suggested so they won't hear about it anymore since apparently a buttload of people want it.
It's not posting it as a new idea, it's taking a stand on an issue you care about and want introduced to the game.
Such noble.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordSquiggles

If i had a dollar for evey time someone posts that coc needed new ranks like it was a new idea... Id get OVER 9000 dollars

---

Well if it's been heard of over 9000 times. XD lol sorry thought of 4chan... Then shouldn't supercell take it into thought and try to put it in process? Plenty of people have put negative and positive input and I'm sure more to come. But it's a good idea for clans that yeah want to reward members that are loyal and have been doing what you expect to help the clan.

What is bad about the current system?

You have not 3 but 4 rolls to give people: (how we use it)
1 Leader (it is switching between the Co-Leaders)
2 Co-Leader (Only a couple confidential players)
3 Elder ( Fixed value players)
4 Member ( New players and players that sit out for a time)

It depends on how many players you have in the clan what amount of Co-Leaders you need.

When you have 20 clan members, 1 Leader and 3 Co-Leaders are enough?
if you make 10 people Co-Leader there is no way to manage your clan, because anyone can do the same..


When you have 50 clan members, 1 leader and 5-8 maybe 10 Co-Leaders are more than enough.


blablalbla

So not neede to change the ranks. Just use the ranks in the right way!

.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BartoS

What is bad about the current system?

You have not 3 but 4 rolls to give people: (how we use it)
1 Leader (it is switching between the Co-Leaders)
2 Co-Leader (Only a couple confidential players)
3 Elder ( Fixed value players)
4 Member ( New players and players that sit out for a time)

It depends on how many players you have in the clan what amount of Co-Leaders you need.

When you have 20 clan members, 1 Leader and 3 Co-Leaders are enough?
if you make 10 people Co-Leader there is no way to manage your clan, because anyone can do the same..


When you have 50 clan members, 1 leader and 5-8 maybe 10 Co-Leaders are more than enough.


blablalbla

So not neede to change the ranks. Just use the ranks in the right way!

.

---

Unless it is family or friends I doubt a leader who is not quitting the game will give up their leadership to someone else! So the leader technically is not a actual rank to give! And member is rankless leaving only 2 real ranks co and elder!

This is not a bad request and there would be no real downsides! Do I believe it should be at the top of the to do list, No! But as I said in the past the more options players have the more the game can grow and be more than originally intended!!! Adding a few extra ranks won't hurt the game or gameplay but make it better, now if high elder and general are added, I don't believe anymore would be needed this would be enough ranks for each type of players! Those that login everyday and try-members, those that donate regularly-elders, those that donate a lot-High elders, those with good defence and offence-generals, those with all these-co leaders, the one that started the clan leader!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kagdais

I really posted it to see everyone's negative and positive. Usually people only see the positive in their ideas till it's put in action, unless they get feed back. Then improve, rethink an re-pitch. :)

---

Nice thinking. Ive seen people do that for a couple of their ideas. They get a better response the second time after they've taken on some of the other users ideas.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BartoS

What is bad about the current system?

You have not 3 but 4 rolls to give people: (how we use it)
1 Leader (it is switching between the Co-Leaders)
2 Co-Leader (Only a couple confidential players)
3 Elder ( Fixed value players)
4 Member ( New players and players that sit out for a time)

It depends on how many players you have in the clan what amount of Co-Leaders you need.

When you have 20 clan members, 1 Leader and 3 Co-Leaders are enough?
if you make 10 people Co-Leader there is no way to manage your clan, because anyone can do the same..


When you have 50 clan members, 1 leader and 5-8 maybe 10 Co-Leaders are more than enough.


blablalbla

So not neede to change the ranks. Just use the ranks in the right way!

.

---

No one is saying change the ranks... Just saying add more ranks. Cause really member doesn't exist it's a blank title and not everyone who plays knows that is a rank to the clan..

And your theory on how to use ranks has holes in it my friend..

If you have played any game that has a guild or a clan with ranking system wih promotion and demotions. You'd understand more where most of us are saying with have a choice between 3-5 ranks. IE any blizzard games, steam games, ea games an a lot others I can't think of or probably never played.

But it'd be Member>Elder>High Elder>Co-Leader>Leader and some say General between high elder and co leader but that to me seems to much.. But it would spread out responsibilities to who you give what rank too and also make those who are more "loyal" an been around the longest doing what they can to help improve the clan feel more appreciated

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kagdais

If you have played any game that has a guild or a clan with ranking system wih promotion and demotions. You'd understand more where most of us are saying with have a choice between 3-5 ranks. IE any blizzard games, steam games, ea games an a lot others I can't think of or probably never played.

But it'd be Member>Elder>High Elder>Co-Leader>Leader and some say General between high elder and co leader but that to me seems to much.. But it would spread out responsibilities to who you give what rank too and also make those who are more "loyal" an been around the longest doing what they can to help improve the clan feel more appreciated

---

I like your idea but I think that there should be a rank between Member and Elder. The rank would not have any privileges per say, but would be more of a status rank, or a way to reward loyal members with out giving them the powers of an elder.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Street3

Unless it is family or friends I doubt a leader who is not quitting the game will give up their leadership to someone else! So the leader technically is not a actual rank to give! And member is rankless leaving only 2 real ranks co and elder!

This is not a bad request and there would be no real downsides! Do I believe it should be at the top of the to do list, No! But as I said in the past the more options players have the more the game can grow and be more than originally intended!!! Adding a few extra ranks won't hurt the game or gameplay but make it better, now if high elder and general are added, I don't believe anymore would be needed this would be enough ranks for each type of players! Those that login everyday and try-members, those that donate regularly-elders, those that donate a lot-High elders, those with good defence and offence-generals, those with all these-co leaders, the one that started the clan leader!!

---

Leader of Order of Chaos passes off lead to me all the time. It happens in trusted Clans.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlyAutumn

I like your idea but I think that there should be a rank between Member and Elder. The rank would not have any privileges per say, but would be more of a status rank, or a way to reward loyal members with out giving them the powers of an elder.

---

I said that in first post to the forum :) but I think this could really work if just work out the kinks and everything put more. And call it member with actual title and member is just newbie(no title just joined) and same as high Elder and General really just a flashy title to have. But no new "powers" just adjust who can be kicked by each rank obvs leader kicks all and co kicks generals and down. General kicks high elder and down and Elder kicks all below. Member doesn't get any "powers" is just a title.