Not neccessarily. People will not be able to due to busy builders and busy lives. Inactive players are plentiful at the lower leagues so they wouldn't remove their boxes and people would race to the bottomQuote:
Originally Posted by Brick2025
Printable View
Not neccessarily. People will not be able to due to busy builders and busy lives. Inactive players are plentiful at the lower leagues so they wouldn't remove their boxes and people would race to the bottomQuote:
Originally Posted by Brick2025
stop suggesting this people. It's bad for the game, it'd ♥♥♥♥ people off royally if they had no free builders to remove the box and it got stolen, it gives high level players an excuse/reason to pick on lowbies even though loot penalty exists, it's just a terrible idea that carry with it a way bigger con list than pro.
Just don't.
No if this was implemented next you would want to steal people's GEMS they already have!!!! So I strongly disagree
It won't help....Quote:
Originally Posted by EpicChris
Or they'd spend/buy the gems to have an extra builder. It'd keep players glued to the game even more.Quote:
Originally Posted by hawdog
Super Cell knows a $$ maker when it sees one.
Yes and letting someone farm for hundreds of gems for free is definitely not one of them.Quote:
Originally Posted by DRTYFN
100 gems is equivalent to about 200,000 gold or elixir, about 1600 in dark elixir.
Gem box hunting would be as easy as TH sniping, maybe even easier as most people who have a gem box on their base don't know about it and wouldn't have it protected.
So from sub200 farming, I could get 1600 in dark elixir every 4 raids with minimal troop expense.
Why would I ever buy gems again?