give gems to most heroic attacker and most heroic defender

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iceageg

I think what he is trying to say is that people will start attacking up in an effort to get most heroic attack simply for the gems, resulting in fewer stars for the war effort. I agree that gems for individuals in individual wars is a bad idea. Gem rewards should be for larger scale accomplishments like the gem reward for the top clans/players in a two week season. This would require some form of the often requested war tournament to implement but I do see it as part of the future of the game with gems as the reward at that level.

---

I AGREE WITH U BRO..MAYBE IT CAN BE USED FOR CLAN WINNING D WAR!!!1 gem to each member..that wd prevent the misuse of it!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zimj

I AGREE WITH U BRO..MAYBE IT CAN BE USED FOR CLAN WINNING D WAR!!!1 gem to each member..that wd prevent the misuse of it!!

---

Possibly but 1 gem per member is quite pathetic. Maybe if it was 5-10 gems per person or something. If it was just 1 gem I personally don't think there'd be any point in adding it. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FireThief

I don't see how it will. Please elaborate. :confused:

---

if im the bottom guy and attack the top, i get most heroic attack (just need 1 star)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zimj

I AGREE WITH U BRO..MAYBE IT CAN BE USED FOR CLAN WINNING D WAR!!!1 gem to each member..that wd prevent the misuse of it!!

---

I would quit the game if supercell was that cheap, hell 5-10 gems is still being cheap.

I'd be looking at 25-50 per person. just like the top clans do 20k, 10k, and 6k vs there top 10 players in each.

Instead of it being the most heroic defender and attacker per war. What if its an achievement? Two separate ones. So whenever you get 3 stars it goes towards getting a lump prize of say for example 250 gems. Say you need to win 10 3 star battles to get the gems. Similar can then be said for the most heroic defender- basically the same but you need to successfully defend against 10 attacks (no stars).

Just a thought and on the first idea. :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Phyxios

I would quit the game if supercell was that cheap, hell 5-10 gems is still being cheap.

I'd be looking at 25-50 per person. just like the top clans do 20k, 10k, and 6k vs there top 10 players in each.

---

Hmmm I didn't think about it in comparison to the top clans. Thats a good point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Phyxios

if im the bottom guy and attack the top, i get most heroic attack (just need 1 star)

I would quit the game if supercell was that cheap, hell 5-10 gems is still being cheap.

I'd be looking at 25-50 per person. just like the top clans do 20k, 10k, and 6k vs there top 10 players in each.

---

I could be wrong but I don't think 1 star attacks gets you heroic attacks alone. TH snipers don't get heroic attacks even though they got 1 star on someone 30+ ranks above them

Also, 25-50 is a lot if you want to compare it to the top clan rewards. Getting the top clan is significantly harder and all the members (up to 50) gets the reward compared to 10 people dividing the top clan reward equally.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FireThief

Instead of it being the most heroic defender and attacker per war. What if its an achievement? Two separate ones. So whenever you get 3 stars it goes towards getting a lump prize of say for example 250 gems. Say you need to win 10 3 star battles to get the gems. Similar can then be said for the most heroic defender- basically the same but you need to successfully defend against 10 attacks (no stars).

Just a thought and on the first idea. :cool:

---

This is similar to the current star achievement but would encourage people to attack too low

Another problem with using the existing heroic attack/defense mechanic is that it is almost impossible for the top 5 players to qualify. As the #2 in my clan I regularly attack the #1 or #2 for 3 stars but it is always one of our 20something players who managed to attack up that has "Most Heroic". Same with defense. #2 defending against #2 is currently scored as less heroic than #30 defending themselves against #25.

Again, I am for gems being a reward for a larger scale war tournament or something of that nature but I see some serious flaws in using the existing "most heroic" scoring in addition to those already mentioned

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sirix

This is similar to the current star achievement but would encourage people to attack too low

---

Thats true, nvm. Scrub my idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cww007

Please don't do this Supercell. Then you will have people trying to attack out of their range just to get gems. I agree that gems would be an awesome perk for the winning team as part of the loot bonus - but please keep it at a clan level so people don't do stupid attacks in wars. ;)

---

Exactly wat i was thinking, supercell already gives gems if someone gets a ton of stars, see "War Hero" achievement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sirix

I could be wrong but I don't think 1 star attacks gets you heroic attacks alone. TH snipers don't get heroic attacks even though they got 1 star on someone 30+ ranks above them

Also, 25-50 is a lot if you want to compare it to the top clan rewards. Getting the top clan is significantly harder and all the members (up to 50) gets the reward compared to 10 people dividing the top clan reward equally.



This is similar to the current star achievement but would encourage people to attack too low

---

The achievement should be 3-star your recommended target 10 times or something like that to prevent people attacking low