Auto ban from next war if no attacks are performed in the previous war(opt in/out)
Hi so after a couple of days on here I find people are in favour of an opt in/out button for wars taking place in which I feel is a good idea and more fair than leaders or co's choosing who they want in the next war. That said I if the opt in/out button did come into effect say reachable via your clan castle as a slider bar or in your war screen to show you are available for the war team, I then feel it would not resolve the issue of members not doing attacks as they may opt in but not exactly do there attacks or even some may leave the clan, leaving you in the same boat as before. So giving it some thought I came up with an automatic banning system that punishes members for not doing there attacks and this is how I feel it would work out like, ok let me explain, say the opt in button is in effect and you have opted into the next war with your clan but you do not do your attacks 🙀 or leave the clan you opted into going into war with, this is what would happen. On leaving the clan during a war with no attacks performed you would get yourself no one else's fault or leaders, a ban from the next two wars any clan starts when in any clan(it would remove your ban automatically). Second point if you are still in your clan and opt into a war but do no attacks you would then get yourself again no one else's fault an instant ban from the next war your clan starts. I feel this would be fair and better than leaders picking most active members or prevent favouritism in war member choosing. Please have a vote on this system for me I am interested to see how many people are getting annoyed with none attackers making there clan lose wars 👌 thanks for reading have fun and happy gaming all 👍
Why would you opt into a war with the opt in button in force if you was on holiday
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Satse
Nr what if you are on vacation etc. etc. So ya Will be kicked and you can't anything do at it... It's a nice idea, but pls make it Some better...
No not kicked just a ban for 1 war or 2 wars if you opt into war then leave a clan plus you would not select yourself to be available for the war if you was on holiday the opt in/out option explained would be for when you are on holiday and don't wish to participate in the war saving your clan a loss on two attacks you would not be punished for that.👌 and most of all when you return you are still in your clan and can then select to opt back into the clan wars with your clan think of it as an holiday button but people who abuse it by opting in and still not attacking those are the ones that will be punished and the clan hoppers of course.👍
Why would you want to kick your friends when they are only on holiday?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hawdog
Sparky, this doesn't need to be made automated. It is a quick and simple manual check that (co)leaders can do at the end of each war to see which players didn't user any of their attacks.
If this is the rule you want your clan to enforce, then just manually kick them if they didn't use either of their previous attacks in the last war, simple.
No need for SC to make this an automated feature. In any decent clan, this should either never happen or happen very seldom that manually kicking doesn't take longer than half a minute at the end of each war.
Hi I'm not sure you quite understand what we are saying here, you would not want to keep kicking people or friends for having a life outside of clash of clans would you this way the opt in/out selection button that you your self choose to be available for the next war would help you know who is not willing or going to attack in the next war plus if someone did opt into the war with no intensions of attacking like hoppers do then leave they would be punished with a 1 war ban if still in your clan but a 2 war ban if they leave during the war not doing attacks. Maybe if the ones who wanted to leave could but had to perform there attacks for the current clan before leaving to avoid there 2 war ban👍👌🌟💫🌟💫🌟 simply explained.
Nothing to do with leadership my friend!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
reddy4u2
If they do this, there is much less of a need for leadership and organization for the clan wars. The clans that win wars are those that keep good, active attackers in the wars. If members are automatically kicked/banned for not attacking, more clans without good leadership and organization will win wars when they don't deserve to.
I strongly disagree with you buddy except your opinion though but you are going to tell me it's fair that people come into the clan and leave during a war and this is the leaders fault, how can it be I think it would stop hoppers jumping in and out of clans for no reason and punishing those members that purposely leave during wars and as for clans winning when they don't deserve it how have you thought of that due to the fact it will still be on points as in stars the winning clans will deserve it based on more destruction hence 3 staring a base so it would be more fair. From what you said it seems as though you are a bad leader always hoping the other clan has more inactive members or hoppers that have left so you can win easier rather than helping your clan achieve the big 3 star finishes you seem to disagree probably due to your wins being more on other clans having members on holiday or not doing attacks. So you now see its nothing to do with leadership and it would improve the over all game play and make wars more challenging due to the fact you know everyone in that clan is going to attack or be punished. Having faith in your clan to get a better destruction rate is what makes a better leader not kicking players that might be on holiday and having a life outside clash of clans. My point has been made here thanks.👍 happy gaming n have fun buddy.
Read what people mean and are going on about before posting insulting comments!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
reddy4u2
i agree that there isn't anything you can do about players leaving before the war starts, but if they leave right at the start of preparation day, they essentially have a 48 hour ban from clan wars. However, for players that don't use their attacks, it is not fair to ban them from the next war automatically. Maybe that player even told the leader that he wouldn't attack and the leader is fine with it, but that player is still banned for the next war. How is that ok?
Ok first off thanks i like to butcher the english language it's great too. Second comment to the above is you are posting and not reading properly ok, we are commenting to a system with an opt in/out of war button that supercell have not even put in yet so yes it would be fair to ban them if they have opted in to a war and not done their attacks as they should of opted out of it so they was not even present in the war line up. The members would not have to tell the leader they are not doing their attacks if they opted out of war via the new not yet put in opt out of war button. This would be useful if you was going on holiday.
First of all, this has nothing to do with me, and fyi, i am not a leader. The clan i am in has won each of its last three wars by no more than 5 stars (in a 40 vs 40 war) and neither clan had more than 10 attacks remaining. I don't know what clan you are in, but in high-level clans we almost never average more than 1.5 stars per attack. (and there are rarely ever more than 2 or 3 players who use neither attacks.)
your statement here is self motivated, you clearly do not think of lower just starting off clans or members. I am a clan leader and know exactly what it is like for my clan who get let down by none attackers or hoppers when they have done their attacks and have give it their all. We do 40 vs 40 wars also and get let down by around 2 attacks where someone is on holiday and would of preferred to opt out of the war from the start but at the moment is unable too.
Clan wars have nothing to do with leadership? Then what do these next two quotes mean?
I was referring to your comment here remember this👇
originally posted by reddy4u2
if they do this, there is much less of a need for leadership and organization for the clan wars. The clans that win wars are those that keep good, active attackers in the wars. If members are automatically kicked/banned for not attacking, more clans without good leadership and organization will win wars when they don't deserve to.
So now before attempting to try to make me look stupid on a simple friendly forum in which i did not ask you in particular to comment please do not try to twist what i am saying to you ok. In my comment i was referring to the fact that it has nothing to do with leadership when members leave or do not do attacks ok, of course clan wars have everything to do with leadership i am not stupid thanks, i was enlightening you in fact.
If i am correctly understanding your butchering of the english language, then what is underlined above and what i quoted below are two contradicting points.
Obviously you do not understand anything i have said in fact their is no contradicting points anywhere in what i said as you clearly read wrong what i was saying i did not or ever say that (wars have nothing to do with leaders).
I now rest my case 😃😂
:)[/quote]
They would not be managing your clan matey
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JohnnyBGood
Exactly.
I don't need SC to decide how my clan should be managed, and neither should the OP.
They would not be managing your clan matey, they would just be putting in a opt into war button for your members not being able to participate in wars due to holidays or some other reasons saving the clan a loss of 2 attacks in which another member could do if spectating. So you saying that you would not like to opt out of a war at some point to go abroad on holiday? That way your clan can still do wars without you and not have to hope and prey the other clan has someone not active. The punishment side of it is to stop hoppers ruining a good clans war win streak by leaving during a war or members not attacking when they wanted to go to war in the first place. It's all about giving people a choice due to the fact if like one of my members said the other day I don't want to go to war yet because I have too many defences down upgrading and my comment back was sorry mate can't opt you out and everyone else wants us to start a war today. It's just that simple to understand nothing really to get all worried over supercell would not be managing your clan trust me. [/QUOTE] simples!
I wish people would stop getting friends of friends to comment pointlessly!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
iceageg
Tinkerbell, this thread has lived past it's usefulness as well. Please close it.
This thread is useful its a thread to gain information on true members who wish for change not someone pointless opinion that does not even matter because someone told them to post as a vendetta. Grow up and see what it's really about. #improvements [/QUOTE]
