Auto ban from next war if no attacks are performed in the previous war(opt in/out)
Hi so after a couple of days on here I find people are in favour of an opt in/out button for wars taking place in which I feel is a good idea and more fair than leaders or co's choosing who they want in the next war. That said I if the opt in/out button did come into effect say reachable via your clan castle as a slider bar or in your war screen to show you are available for the war team, I then feel it would not resolve the issue of members not doing attacks as they may opt in but not exactly do there attacks or even some may leave the clan, leaving you in the same boat as before. So giving it some thought I came up with an automatic banning system that punishes members for not doing there attacks and this is how I feel it would work out like, ok let me explain, say the opt in button is in effect and you have opted into the next war with your clan but you do not do your attacks 🙀 or leave the clan you opted into going into war with, this is what would happen. On leaving the clan during a war with no attacks performed you would get yourself no one else's fault or leaders, a ban from the next two wars any clan starts when in any clan(it would remove your ban automatically). Second point if you are still in your clan and opt into a war but do no attacks you would then get yourself again no one else's fault an instant ban from the next war your clan starts. I feel this would be fair and better than leaders picking most active members or prevent favouritism in war member choosing. Please have a vote on this system for me I am interested to see how many people are getting annoyed with none attackers making there clan lose wars 👌 thanks for reading have fun and happy gaming all 👍
Why would you opt into a war with the opt in button in force if you was on holiday
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Satse
Nr what if you are on vacation etc. etc. So ya Will be kicked and you can't anything do at it... It's a nice idea, but pls make it Some better...
No not kicked just a ban for 1 war or 2 wars if you opt into war then leave a clan plus you would not select yourself to be available for the war if you was on holiday the opt in/out option explained would be for when you are on holiday and don't wish to participate in the war saving your clan a loss on two attacks you would not be punished for that.👌 and most of all when you return you are still in your clan and can then select to opt back into the clan wars with your clan think of it as an holiday button but people who abuse it by opting in and still not attacking those are the ones that will be punished and the clan hoppers of course.👍
Why would you want to kick your friends when they are only on holiday?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hawdog
Sparky, this doesn't need to be made automated. It is a quick and simple manual check that (co)leaders can do at the end of each war to see which players didn't user any of their attacks.
If this is the rule you want your clan to enforce, then just manually kick them if they didn't use either of their previous attacks in the last war, simple.
No need for SC to make this an automated feature. In any decent clan, this should either never happen or happen very seldom that manually kicking doesn't take longer than half a minute at the end of each war.
Hi I'm not sure you quite understand what we are saying here, you would not want to keep kicking people or friends for having a life outside of clash of clans would you this way the opt in/out selection button that you your self choose to be available for the next war would help you know who is not willing or going to attack in the next war plus if someone did opt into the war with no intensions of attacking like hoppers do then leave they would be punished with a 1 war ban if still in your clan but a 2 war ban if they leave during the war not doing attacks. Maybe if the ones who wanted to leave could but had to perform there attacks for the current clan before leaving to avoid there 2 war ban👍👌🌟💫🌟💫🌟 simply explained.
Nothing to do with leadership my friend!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
reddy4u2
If they do this, there is much less of a need for leadership and organization for the clan wars. The clans that win wars are those that keep good, active attackers in the wars. If members are automatically kicked/banned for not attacking, more clans without good leadership and organization will win wars when they don't deserve to.
I strongly disagree with you buddy except your opinion though but you are going to tell me it's fair that people come into the clan and leave during a war and this is the leaders fault, how can it be I think it would stop hoppers jumping in and out of clans for no reason and punishing those members that purposely leave during wars and as for clans winning when they don't deserve it how have you thought of that due to the fact it will still be on points as in stars the winning clans will deserve it based on more destruction hence 3 staring a base so it would be more fair. From what you said it seems as though you are a bad leader always hoping the other clan has more inactive members or hoppers that have left so you can win easier rather than helping your clan achieve the big 3 star finishes you seem to disagree probably due to your wins being more on other clans having members on holiday or not doing attacks. So you now see its nothing to do with leadership and it would improve the over all game play and make wars more challenging due to the fact you know everyone in that clan is going to attack or be punished. Having faith in your clan to get a better destruction rate is what makes a better leader not kicking players that might be on holiday and having a life outside clash of clans. My point has been made here thanks.👍 happy gaming n have fun buddy.
