Printable View
That is correct, all but the part where you said players can pick their FIRST attack. I'm lookin for the option to be able to claim, or choose, or call, whatever you'd like, BOTH attacks. You can still have the ability to choose 1 or NONE. As far as your Leader capabilities, that is on the dot for what I'm thinking. Forgive me, but was there a "but" to your comment?Quote:
Originally Posted by demonite72
Icegage- I was considering something that was incredibly user-friendly, but still worked for what it was. I see you had a system with your idea. I particularly like the part when you should be able to have each player "matched" to their skill level. It could work something like the in game feature of how bases are "reccomended" for you to attack. I'd like to ask you if we collaborate our ideas a bit? If we throw your structure with my simplicity, im seeing the potential for a homerun.Quote:
Originally Posted by iceageg
The only real difference between your suggestion and mine is that mine added one more layer of leader control before the claims could be made offering a way to leave it as it is, claim targets as you suggested, or a couple of slightly more complex options that require active leadership but offer a great deal more strategy to be executed. I am happy to refine the idea and hopefully get it implemented.Quote:
Originally Posted by kinganthony
To prevent the bottom members claiming the top members maybe you should only be able to claim an enemy close to your recommended target. Also when starting a war a leader or co leader should be able to specify how far away from your recommended target. For example the leader could choose you may only claim your recommended target, or you may claim one up or one down from your recommended target. I understand that you do not see your recommended target during preparation day, so for my modification that would need to be changed but it's just an idea so feel free to modify
Yeah, on the matter of lower leveled players attacking unwanted higher level bases, or vice versa, take a look at this thread posted a little while ago:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewy262
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...nagement-ideas
It is a similar concept, but what I generally like from it is the fact that any player would be constricted to a certain level range, whereas a level 40 can attack another base between the levels 30-50, or something like that.
As for the recommended target option not being available during preparation, I don't necessarily think it makes a difference. The bases are still able to be subject to change, as the owner upgrades his/her base OR decides to make changes to the layout. So either way, having the level range available on WAR day shouldn't be a problem.
Thank you for that suggestion, that was a good point.
Yes, the more complex leadership roles are what I was talking about. Obviously I am a strong supporter of this idea, but I do not necessarily believe the complexity of the so-called "new" leader role in clan wars will fly, simply because it is a bit complicated for the leader to always have to be watching the war. Life is full of complexities and I don't think doing those new roles after every war is reasonable. HOWEVER, I do think that this would increase the strategizing of clan wars IMMENSELY.Quote:
Originally Posted by iceageg
I updated the OP with newer, hopefully more improved concepts. Let me know if you come up with some other tidbits that could be helpful. I appreciate it.
I would ideally like to attempt to post pictures or graphics on how I envision this to look in the OP. Anyone have any suggestions on how I may go about doing that?
:cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:
Once you have the image you just use the "Insert Image" button above the text you are typing. It is right there in the same pallet as the Link, Unlink and Insert Video buttons.
It would be best to have some kind of function such as co leaders and leaders having the ability to confirm the call, that would fix most of the cons that you have listed