Elixir & DE = troop donation, but GOLD = X Donation? Ideas please.

14 level 8 walls for 30k of someone else's money?

Genius!

Trade Resources For Gems
We all know you can buy resources with gems. However we should also be able to buy gems with resources. Eg. If 450 gems can buy 800,000 elixir then 800,000 elixir should be able to buy 450 gems.

This will be practical in many situations. A strong farming player will be able to trade his resources for gems so he can rush builds, rush troops, buy shields, or enhance mines or barracks. Also a farmer specifically farming for eg. Gold to build walls will be able to sell his excess elixir to get gems to buy gold.

If you like this idea please contact Supercell and tell them to implement it.

Sincerely,
Aron51

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ARON51

Trade Resources For Gems
We all know you can buy resources with gems. However we should also be able to buy gems with resources. Eg. If 450 gems can buy 800,000 elixir then 800,000 elixir should be able to buy 450 gems.

This will be practical in many situations. A strong farming player will be able to trade his resources for gems so he can rush builds, rush troops, buy shields, or enhance mines or barracks. Also a farmer specifically farming for eg. Gold to build walls will be able to sell his excess elixir to get gems to buy gold.

If you like this idea please contact Supercell and tell them to implement it.

Sincerely,
Aron51

---

Don't advertise your idea on other threads.

Donating troops isn't donating elixir and this shouldn't be ruled out either. There's a difference between donating the actual resource and donating something to get you resource (and save some money). It's sort of like how I rather buy a homeless guy a meal instead of giving him some money where he might use it for questionable things. Well this analogy isn't that good but it shows how there's a difference between donating money and donating the produce of the money

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by C8XYR

This is an ideas thread and the OP is perfectly valid, its clear a small number of you like to over police the sub forum and point out rules and the search feature instead of actively contributing. It's quite sad.
May i suggest a slightly more lax approach as a large number of clash players are quite young. The forum police, despite being well meaning im sure, are ruining the experience for the average forum user.

---

Well we are sorry, there is no reason to give advice/criticism on ideas that are ruled out/widely suggested. If it's ruled out it won't be added no matter what anyone says and if it's widely suggested you can just search it and find out why it hasn't been added/why people do or don't like the idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alfesicob

This idea is currently ruled out please read the stickies before posting

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mayboy36

Its ruled out

---

As these people say, the idea is ruled out so there's no sense posting advice/criticism. I'm sorry if I seem like a killjoy but it's the truth.