Printable View
This is a simple idea, but hear me out. Gems are hard to get. This would make them a bit easier to get. What happens is when you raid sombody you can get 1/5 if their gems, but once you get 3 you cant get more. 1 star get 1/3 of the avalible gems 2 stars get 2/3 3 stars gets 3/3.
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by BoonieChi
Gems are a premium currency.
You shouldn't be able to raid them.
This idea would get low level TH people massacred by high ones who want easy gems. Stealing gems is also bad since some people pay real money for them. While it's good that you put a cap on the 1/5, anything more than 0 gems per win is too much because it would discourage people from buying gems and hurt SuperCell's business.
Is this a joke? This idea is not good at all.
Gems are not hard to get... Just go buy some. It takes time to save them up removing stuff because that is not really the way to get them, it is only a gift from SC. If you want gems so bad, just buy some.Quote:
Originally Posted by BoonieChi
First, in the form that it's in this idea is not good. I could quit buying gems and simply steal from other high level players. But that being said, winning 1 gem per star isn't a bad idea if the gems come from Super Cell and not players. It would add a bit more encouragement for the noobs to get out there and attack, and add incentive to farmers to get 50% more often.
Now for the hate... Brenn, Ninja, and EasyE. I've seen dozens of posts from each of you, and not one is positive. Not one. I haven't seen any of you 3 offer anything to any posts to improve an idea and make it workable. It's always "I'm great and all knowing and your idea is terrible." I'm asking you 3 here and now to completely stop posting if you only have your negative self-indulgent nonsense to offer to our community. Thanks
First off... We say ideas are bad, because they truly are bad. Either they are on the ruled out list, or they would be game breaking. In my posts, at least, I try to say why the idea is bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don7011
If it is on the ruled out list, I don't have any remorse for shooting down ideas. Zero. The people should have read the sticky (You know, the "READ THIS BEFORE POSTING" one?). Same thing if the poster hasn't taken the time to go through, read similar posts, and actually think about the consequences of the addition.
As for that I have done nothing to help the community, please look at the threads in my signature. They both address an urgent issue in game: Global chat.
Please don't accuse me of doing nothing to help the community, when (IN MY SIG, which you can see beneath my posts) I have the links to 2 threads which would actually help. One of them I helped a fair bit with. The other, I created myself, and ACTUALLY TOOK THE TIME TO COMPLETELY WRITE OUT THE CODE WHICH WOULD PRODUCE THE DESIRED EFFECt. If that isn't something valuable to offer to the community, nothing is.
Edit: To elaborate: I don't post any ways to improve stuff, because THERE IS NO WAY TO IMPROVE THEM. Either the idea is on the ruled out list, and won't be implemented, or it would negatively impact the game in some way.
For example: This thread.
Two things could happen:
1. Supercell would lose profits from gem sales (and would thus not implement it)
2. People who bought gems would lose them, which they wouldn't want (So SC wouldn't implement it)
Another example: Your "reset trophies" thread:
It is punishing people who do well (-trophies to offers)
The high-level champs (SC's main source of income) would quit playing, as they would have wasted all their money.
SC isn't going to do anything that would alienate their main source of income.
Third example: The ever-present "transfer loot" thread:
1. People could create many different accounts, funneling all of the loot into one main account. Unfair.
2. High-tier players could give unneeded loot to lower levels, who would then need to put in no effort to max their base.
You get why I comment to say that ideas are bad?
You should check again bud.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don7011
I only "hate" this thread so much because it is asked soooooooo many times. Also, it is a bad idea plain and simple.
I get plenty of gems from the trees and the 25 gem boxes.
I like this idea but make it so it only gives a gem if you attack and win against someone at your th level or above. Otherwise you'll get a lot of bottom feeders like a th7 attacking a th5 for an easy 3 stars + 3 gems.
Hmm... Does anyone think I went too far in my response?Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenn