Removing Town Hall Loot Penalty And Adding New Minimum Rank Per Town Hall

The current Loot penalty:

Town Hall Level Difference	Percentage of Loot Available
0	100%
1	90%
2	50%
3	25%
4 or more	5%

i would like to suggest the loot penalty to be removed, i know this will mean high levels can attack low levels. however if they change the trophy system slightly to prevent high levels dropping below a specific rank then i believe it would be fine.

Town Hall Level	Minimum Rank
2	200
3	300
4	400
5	500
6	6,00
7	8,00
8	1,000
9	1,200
10	1,400

So if low levels do not want to be raided by higher levels then they should remain at lower ranks. however if they do climb ranks then they should be open to higher levels. If low levels can pick on high level collectors then higher levels should also be able to pick on lower levels without any penalty.

Why is everyone hating on the leagues/higher people attacking lower!?

If you don't want to get attacked by that much of higher people, go lower in trophies, I Think the trophy system and leagues are totally fine.

This is just farming which is fine with clash of clans. part of the game i think

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NuNuHeAd99

Why is everyone hating on the leagues/higher people attacking lower!?

If you don't want to get attacked by that much of higher people, go lower in trophies, I Think the trophy system and leagues are totally fine.

This is just farming which is fine with clash of clans. part of the game i think

---

what iam suggesting actually helps higher levels and for low levels that hate to be raided by higher levels they can avoid it also.

This is a pretty terrible idea. The whole point of a trophy system is it abstracts relative ranking from your base. This is important because people have differing play abilities and also for a given TH, the quantity as well as level of buildings can vary wildly.

You're basically saying that lower level folks don't have the right to push for as many trophies as they can get because doing so would cost them all their resources. This would also be pretty brutal to folks who rush their THs.

When you propose changes you should ask yourself if those changes would make the game more fun for everyone.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dahimi

This is a pretty terrible idea. The whole point of a trophy system is it abstracts relative ranking from your base. This is important because people have differing play abilities and also for a given TH, the quantity as well as level of buildings can vary wildly.

You're basically saying that lower level folks don't have the right to push for as many trophies as they can get because doing so would cost them all their resources. This would also be pretty brutal to folks who rush their THs.

When you propose changes you should ask yourself if those changes would make the game more fun for everyone.

---

i dont see why this would stop low levels pushing trophies. low levels that attacks high levels gains a massive amount of loot from high level collectors which they can find at higher ranks. as for higher levels they don't retaliate as they cant get anything at all from them. i believe this game should be more open allowing any TH to attack any TH, but with the penalty it highly restricts them and if players really hate higher TH attacking themselves then they can stay safe at their trophy range. if you climb ranks then their should be a risk not an easy way to the top because you have low TH.

ive created an account with absolutely no defence for fun and iam doing fine on it.

thats stupid and 1000 is easy even for a town hall 6

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChiefJoshuaCOC

thats stupid and 1000 is easy even for a town hall 6

---

its not suppose to be hard

The loot penalty protects lower lvl player from getting destroyed by higher lvl players, if u want to take it out u need to propose a different solution to higher lvl players attacking lower lvl players.

low levels attack higher levels with high loot
this will then make higher levels have a harder time to find high loot bases

unless low levels gets penalised for attacking high levels, i dont see what's wrong with allowing higher levels being able to attack low levels too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zetris

i dont see why this would stop low levels pushing trophies. low levels that attacks high levels gains a massive amount of loot from high level collectors which they can find at higher ranks.

---

Collectors pretty much max out at TH7. They also get no more loot than high level players get for attacking the same bases, so I'm not sure how your logic follows here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zetris

as for higher levels they don't retaliate as they cant get anything at all from them. i believe this game should be more open allowing any TH to attack any TH, but with the penalty it highly restricts them and if players really hate higher TH attacking themselves then they can stay safe at their trophy range. if you climb ranks then their should be a risk not an easy way to the top because you have low TH.

---

This only makes sense if your entire view of the game is resource focused. For many, including Supercell, it is not.

Also how can you say the game should be more open by allowing any TH to attack any TH (which is something people can already do) while advocating for a system that is the exact opposite of that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zetris

ive created an account with absolutely no defence for fun and iam doing fine on it.

---

So?